Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 22;18:24. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00642-w

Table 6.

Results

References Intervention group mean depression scores (Standard Deviation) Control group mean depression scores (Standard Deviation) Treatment effect (P value) Effect size Factors affecting efficacy
Baseline Post-intervention Baseline Post-Intervention
Adegbolagun et al. [54] 4.50 (2.81) 2.83 (1.92) NA NA P < 0.02 NA Increase in coping as a possible mediator
Are et al. [55] 24.30 (6.59) 4.60 (7.35) 24.25 (6.06) 17.05 (11.17) P = 0.0001 np2 = 0.32 Age, gender, religion, and parent’s level of education did not predict outcome. Increased self esteem and knowledge of depression as possible mediators
Bella-Awusah et al. [56] 25.3 (8.8) 11.8 (9.5) 24.2 (6.1) 21.1 (7.9) P = 0.0001 ƞp2 = 0.31 NR
Bolton et al. [75] 43.5 (10.1) 27.8 (17.2) 44.2 (10.8) 37.3 (15.8) P = 0.02 NR Sex predicted the outcome. Age did not predict outcome. Increased adherence was associated with reduction in symptoms
Ede et al. [57] 49.10 (6.25) 12.45 (6.61) 50.44 (7.68) 49.30 (4.99) P < 0.001 ƞp2 = 0.88 NR
Eseadi et al. [58] 40.15 (4.24) 12.91 (5.70) 41.97 (4.92) 44.39 (5.56) P < 0.0001 ƞp2 = 0.82 NR
Ezegbe et al. [59] 68.57 (10.06) 14.68 (1.63) 65.11 (13.06) 64.63 (17.13) P = 0.0001 ƞp2 = 0.91 Level of adherence did not moderate treatment outcome
Ezeudu et al. [60] 46 (6) 24 (4) 43 (5) 42(4) P < 0.001 ƞp2 = 0.916 NR
Getanda and Vostanis [63] 18.1 (6.7) 10 (6.9) 15.8 (5.3) 17.0 (5.5) P = 0.0001 np2 = 0.338 NR
Isa et al. [61] 24.4 (11.18) 3.94 (2.10) NA NA P = 0.001 NA Increased Hope and knowledge of depression as a possible mediator
Kaminer et al. [70] 26.97 (14.96) 15.44 (14.16) 26.79 (13.27) 23.44 (17) P = 0.03 d = 0.51 NR
McMullen et al. [67] 38.1 (9.3) 7.0 (5.8) 38.1 (11.1) 29.3 (13.6) P < 0.001 ƞp2 = 0.567 NR
O'Callaghan et al. [68] 37.96 (10.16) 13.96 (10.30) 39.18 (10.57) 40.04 (15.18) P < 0.001 ƞp2 = 0.517 NR
Ofoegbu et al. [62] 65.30 (2.61) 8.60 (0.21) 64.78 (3.67) 65.50 (2.4) P = 0.0001 ƞp2 = 0.959 NR
Olashore et al. [71] 13 (2.0) 7 (3.0) 13 (3.0) 9 (2.0) P = 0.001 ƞp2 = 0.20 NR
Osborn et al. [65] 14.43 (3.35) 8.46 (4.98) 13.18 (2.89) 10.64 (4.89) P = 0.028 d = 0.5 Younger adolescents reported larger declines in depressive symptoms. Adolescents with moderate to severe depression had larger symptom reduction
Osborn et al. [64] 13.43 (4.14) 10.21 (4.39) 12.91 (3.52) 12.52 (4.23) P = 0.038 d = 0.32 Age and sex were not associated with outcome
Osborn et al. [66] 8.29 (5.30) 5.69 (4.23) 8.40 (4.69) 8.37 (5.53) P = 0.001 d = 0.52 NR
Rivet-Duval et al. [73] 51.8 (9.07) 47.5 (7.95) 50.61 (9.19) 49.98 (11.07) P < 0.001 d = 0.32 NR
Thurman et al. [69] 16.03 (1.39) 16.46 (1.92) 14.67(1.26) 15.63 (2.12) P = 0.145 NE Age and sex showed no moderation effect on results
Tol et al. [72] 9.97 (4.82) 8.15(5.02) 11.28 (5.08) 8.49 (5.8) P = 0.149 NE Larger households and having both parents were effect moderators
Unterhitzenberger and Rosner [74] 18.8 (10.60) 20.6 (11.4) 15.7 (9.9) 12.1 (10.3) P = 0.518 NE NR

NA Not applicable, NR Not reported, NE No effect

Measures of effect: np2, Partial Eta Squared, d Cohen’s D