Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;24:758. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11140-7

Table 2.

Summary of evidence on approaches, interventions, or strategies applied to mitigate deleterious impacts on children and youth during the COVID-19 pandemic by well-being domain

Questions used to guide evidence synthesis Good Health and Optimum Nutrition7 Connectedness Safety and a Supportive Environment Learning, competence, education, skills, and employability Agency and Resilience
N = 12 N = 7 N = 2 N = 10 N = 8
Steps or guiding principles described1 9 75.0% 6 85.7% 2 100.0% 6 60.0% 4 50.0%
Derived from empirical evidence in full or part2 11 91.7% 5 71.4% 2 100.0% 8 80.0% 7 87.5%
Minimum expertise considered3 10 83.3% 4 57.1% 2 100.0% 6 60.0% 5 62.5%
Limitations reported4 7 58.3% 6 85.7% 2 100.0% 6 60.0% 3 37.5%
Approach is reproducible5 7 58.3% 5 71.4% 2 100.0% 6 60.0% 2 25.0%
Approach can be feasibly applied to other contexts6 7 58.3% 3 42.7% 2 100.0% 4 40.0% 1 12.5%

1Steps or guiding principles to conduct the approach

2Approach is derived from empirical evidence (i.e., through observation or experiment) or from published theory

3Minimum expertise required to conduct the approach

4Limitations to the approach

5Is the approach reproducible? (i.e., evidenced by use at multiple settings)

6Can the approach can be feasibly applied to other contexts?

7As described by Ross DA, Hinton R, Melles-Brewer M, et al. Adolescent well-being: a definition and conceptual framework. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):472–476