Table 2.
Questions used to guide evidence synthesis | Good Health and Optimum Nutrition7 | Connectedness | Safety and a Supportive Environment | Learning, competence, education, skills, and employability | Agency and Resilience | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 12 | N = 7 | N = 2 | N = 10 | N = 8 | ||||||
Steps or guiding principles described1 | 9 | 75.0% | 6 | 85.7% | 2 | 100.0% | 6 | 60.0% | 4 | 50.0% |
Derived from empirical evidence in full or part2 | 11 | 91.7% | 5 | 71.4% | 2 | 100.0% | 8 | 80.0% | 7 | 87.5% |
Minimum expertise considered3 | 10 | 83.3% | 4 | 57.1% | 2 | 100.0% | 6 | 60.0% | 5 | 62.5% |
Limitations reported4 | 7 | 58.3% | 6 | 85.7% | 2 | 100.0% | 6 | 60.0% | 3 | 37.5% |
Approach is reproducible5 | 7 | 58.3% | 5 | 71.4% | 2 | 100.0% | 6 | 60.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
Approach can be feasibly applied to other contexts6 | 7 | 58.3% | 3 | 42.7% | 2 | 100.0% | 4 | 40.0% | 1 | 12.5% |
1Steps or guiding principles to conduct the approach
2Approach is derived from empirical evidence (i.e., through observation or experiment) or from published theory
3Minimum expertise required to conduct the approach
4Limitations to the approach
5Is the approach reproducible? (i.e., evidenced by use at multiple settings)
6Can the approach can be feasibly applied to other contexts?
7As described by Ross DA, Hinton R, Melles-Brewer M, et al. Adolescent well-being: a definition and conceptual framework. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):472–476