Skip to main content
. 2024 May 2;25(4):669–683. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2

Table 2.

Adverse events in patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time during the 52-week study perioda

n, % Vehicle to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream (n = 22) 1.5% ruxolitinib cream
(n = 92)
Total 1.5% ruxolitinib cream (n = 114)
Patients with TEAE 17 (77.3) 43 (46.7) 60 (52.6)
Most common TEAEb
 Upper respiratory tract infection 3 (13.6) 15 (16.3) 18 (15.8)
 Nasopharyngitis 2 (9.1) 7 (7.6) 9 (7.9)
 Influenza 2 (9.1) 5 (5.4) 7 (6.1)
 Headache 2 (9.1) 3 (3.3) 5 (4.4)
 Pharyngitis 0 5 (5.4) 5 (4.4)
 Rhinitis 2 (9.1) 2 (2.2) 4 (3.5)
 Streptococcal pharyngitis 1 (4.5) 2 (2.2) 3 (2.6)
 Cough 0 2 (2.2) 2 (1.8)
 Acne 0 2 (2.2) 2 (1.8)
 Neutropenia 2 (9.1) 0 2 (1.8)
 Sinusitis 1 (4.5) 1 (1.1) 2 (1.8)
Patients with application site reactions 1 (4.5) 1 (1.1) 2 (1.8)
 Application site painc 0 1 (1.1) 1 (0.9)
 Application site pustules 1 (4.5) 0 1 (0.9)
Patients with treatment-related AEd 2 (9.1) 3 (3.3) 5 (4.4)
Patients who discontinued due to a TEAE 0 0 0
Patients with serious TEAE 0 0 0

AE adverse event, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event

aFor patients who switched from vehicle after week 8, the period was 44 weeks

bOccurring in ≥ 2% in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any point in the study

cIncludes application site burning, stinging, and pain after application

dNo treatment-related AE occurred in more than one patient in any group