Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 22;14:14407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65120-2

Table 2.

Screening tests’ characteristics of calf circumference, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, SARCF + EBM, handgrip strength, chair stand time, time up-and-go, and gait speed against the AWGS 2019 criteria.

Screening test Sensitivity%
(95% CI)a
Specificity
(95% CI)a
Positive likelihood ratio
(95% CI)
Negative likelihood ratio
(95% CI)
Positive predictive valuea %
(95% CI)
Negative predictive value %
(95% CI)
Area under the curveB
(95%CI)
1. Calf circumference 85.7 (63.7, 97.0)2,5,7,8 77.0 (65.8, 86.0)6,7 3.73 (2.37, 5.86) 0.19 (0.06, 0.53) 51.4 (34, 68.6) 95.0 (86.1, 99.0) 0.830 (0.734, 0.925)
2. SARC-F 28.6 (11.3, 52.2)1,6 75.7 (64.3, 84.9)4,6,7 1.17 (0.53, 2.58) 0.94 (0.7, 1.27) 25 (9.8, 46.7) 78.9 (67.6, 87.7) 0.509 (0.373, 0.644)b
3. SARC-CalF 76.2 (52.8, 91.8)7,8 78.4 (67.3, 87.1)6,7 3.52 (2.15, 5.78) 0.3 (0.14, 0.66) 50 (31.9, 68.1) 92.1 (82.4, 97.4) 0.782 (0.669, 0.895)
4. SARCF + EBM 40.9 (20.7, 63.6) 96.2 (89.2, 99.2)2,6,8 10.64 (3.15, 35.95) 0.61 (0.43, 0.87) 75 (42.8, 94.5)8 85.2 (76.1, 91.9) 0.860 (0.764, 0.955)
5. Handgrip strength 30.4 (13.2, 52.9)1.6 93.8 (86.2, 98.0)6,8 4.93 (1.73, 14.09) 0.74 (0.56, 0.98) 58.3 (27.7, 84.8) 82.6 (73.3, 89.7) 0.710 (0.593, 0.826)b
6. Chair stand time 87.0 (66.4, 97.2)2,5,7,8 33.3 (23.2, 44.7)1,2,3,4,5,7 1.30 (1.05, 1.63) 0.39 (0.13, 1.17) 27.0 (17.4, 38.6) 90.0 (73.5, 97.9) 0.669 (0.545, 0.794)b
7. Time up and go 8.7 (1.1, 28.0)1,3,6 97.5 (91.4, 99.7)1,2,3,6,8 3.52 (0.52, 23.65) 0.94 (0.82, 1.07) 50.0 (6.8, 93.2) 79.0 (69.7, 86.5) 0.712 (0.585, 0.839)
8. Gait speed 6 m walk 21.7 (7.5, 43.7)1,3,6 60.5 (49.0, 71.2)4,5,7 0.55 (0.24, 1.25) 1.29 (0.98, 1.71) 13.5 (4.5, 28.8)4 73.1 (60.9, 83.2) 0.687 (0.545, 0.829)b

ap-value < 0.05 by chi-square test among Calf circumference, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, SARCF + EBM, Handgrip strength, Chair stand time, Time up and go, and Gait speed 6 m walk.

18p-value < 0.05 for multiple proportions test by Marascuillo procedure.

1Significantly different with Calf circumference (p < 0.05).

2Significantly different with SARC-F (p < 0.05).

3Significantly different with SARC-CalF (p < 0.05).

4Significantly different with SARCF + EBM (p < 0.05).

5Significantly different with Handgrip strength (p < 0.05).

6Significantly different with Chair stand time (p < 0.05).

7Significantly different with Time up and go (p < 0.05).

8Significantly different with Gait speed 6 m walk (p < 0.05).

Bp-value < 0.05 by the DeLong method.

bSignificantly different with Calf circumference (p < 0.05).