Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;15:1383644. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383644

Table 1.

Overview of Relevant Prior Work Towards OS Prediction Using Baseline CT Images in Patients on IO, in a mNSCLC Setting.

Reference Total no. of Patients Accuracy (%) in Test Cohort
(mutually exclusive training and test sets sampled from same cohort)
AUC in Test Cohort
(mutually exclusive training and test sets sampled from same cohort)
Concordance Index (robustness to training/test splits) Generalization Accuracy (%)
(independent cohort)
Jazieh et al. (5) 133 N/A (Ntest = 69) N/A 0.69 (N/A) N/A
Gong et al. (6) 224 50.79 (Ntest = 63) 0.52 (0.39–0.65) 0.51 (0.43–0.6) 52.94 (Ntest = 68)
He et al. (7) 236 83.3 (Ntest = 48) N/A 0.75 (0.59–0.90) N/A
Liu et al. (8) 46 N/A (Ntest = 1) 0.64 (0.48–0.79) 0.86 (0.74–0.97) N/A
Trebeschi et al. (9) 123 N/A (Ntest = 42) 0.76 (N/A) N/A N/A
Work Presented* 917 66.8 (Ntest = 199) 0.71 (0.65–0.78) 0.66 (0.65–0.67) 73.5 (Ntest = 144)

Values not reported are indicated with N/A. Ntest indicates the number of “held-out” samples used to test a model (these samples are not seen by the model during the training phase).

*Results reported are for Model-C+R. Evaluation metrics can be found in Supplementary Table 5 .

AUC, area under the curve; CT, computed tomography; IO, immunotherapy; OS, overall survival; mNSCLC, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; NA, not applicable.