Table 4 •.
QOL Dimension Scores and Bivariate Correlations With the COST Measure of Financial Hardship
QOL Dimensions | Mean (SD), Range | Correlation With FH |
---|---|---|
| ||
Physical functioning (n = 73) | 40.3 (23.8), 0–90 | r = 0.062, P = .599 |
Role limitations due to physical health (n = 74) | 20.6 (34.7), 0–100 | r = 0.282, P = .015 |
Pain (n = 75) | 40.7 (25.4), 0–100 | r = 0.320, P = .005 |
General health (n = 74) | 38.4 (19.4), 0–85 | r = 0.025, P = .832 |
Social functioning (n = 74) | 51.8 (26.1), 0–100 | r =0.183, P = .119 |
Role limitations due to emotional problems (n = 75) | 34.2 (41.0), 0–100 | r = 0.276, P = .017 |
Energy/fatigue (n = 75) | 34.8 (19.9), 0–85 | r =0.014, P = .236 |
Emotional well-being (n = 75) | 64.2 (20.4), 12–100 | r = 0.393, P < .001 |
Abbreviations: COST, COmphrehensive Score for financial Toxicity; FH, financial hardship; QOL, quality of life.