TABLE 3.
Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the multimodal combinatorial model, radiomics model, MoCA scores, and Symptom1 in the training, test, and validation sets.
Characteristics | Training set | Test set | Validation set | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | p‐Value | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | p‐Value | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | p‐Value | |
Multimodal combinatorial model | 0.842 | 0.857 | 0.745 | NA | 0.829 | 0.733 | 0.821 | NA | 0.860 | 0.889 | 0.714 | NA |
Radiomics model | 0.819 | 0.743 | 0.766 | 0.290a | 0.793 | 0.733 | 0.846 | 0.391a | 0.828 | 0.889 | 0.667 | 0.657a |
MoCA | 0.666 | 0.571 | 0.713 | p < 0.001b *** | 0.638 | 0.600 | 0.615 | 0.048b * | 0.642 | 0.722 | 0.524 | 0.002b ** |
Symptom1 | 0.579 | 0.914 | 0.245 | p < 0.001c *** | 0.582 | 0.933 | 0.231 | p < 0.001c *** | 0.532 | 0.111 | 0.952 | p < 0.001c *** |
Note: The markers a, b, and c represent the diagnostic performance comparison of the multimodal combinatorial model with the radiomics model, MoCA, and Symptom1, respectively.
Abbreviation: NA, not available.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.