ABSTRACT
See-saw nystagmus (SSN) is a rare form of nystagmus characterised by alternating elevation with incyclotorsion of one eye and concomitant depression with excyclotorsion of the other eye, often due to abnormalities involving the midbrain and parasellar region. Herein, we highlight a rare case of pendular SSN, which demonstrated complete resolution following resection of a pituitary macroadenoma. A patient in their 40s was identified to have SSN and was diagnosed with a pituitary macroadenoma. They underwent an endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach for resection of the pituitary adenoma. Their nystagmus resolved immediately after surgery. From a review of the literature, resolution and/or significant improvement in SSN occurred in 74% of cases following treatment, with 100%, 86% and 50% following treatment for medication-induced, neurological infarcts, and mass-effect aetiologies of SSN, respectively. SSN is a rare entity with a wide array of aetiologies. Identification of the causative aetiology and appropriate treatment can lead to significant improvement or resolution of the nystagmus in most cases.
KEYWORDS: See-saw nystagmus, acquired jerk nystagmus, hemi-see-saw nystagmus, optic chiasm; pituitary macroadenoma
Introduction
See-saw nystagmus (SSN), first reported by Maddox in 1914,1 is characterised by the simultaneous elevation and incyclotorsion of one eye with concomitant depression and excyclotorsion of the other eye in an alternating manner.2 The mechanism for this form of nystagmus is poorly understood, however it often localises to lesions in the parasellar or midbrain regions. Neuroanatomical pathways implicit in the development of SSN include a unilateral mesodiencephalic lesion occurring in the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (inC) or a medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) lesion involving the vertical semicircular canal pathways.2,3 The pendular variant of SSN more often represents chiasmal involvement in comparison to the jerk variant termed hemi-SSN.2–4 We report a rare case of pendular SSN that displayed complete resolution in the immediate postoperative course following resection of a pituitary macroadenoma and review the literature of SSN and hemi-SSN presentations over the last 20 years.
We report the presentation, treatment and outcome of a patient diagnosed with SSN. Written informed consent for publication of details presented was obtained from the patient. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to identify all published cases of SSN from 2002 to 2022 and their suspected aetiologies, case presentations, treatments, and outcomes. A manual search was performed using the PubMed search engine for the terms ‘seesaw nystagmus’ OR ‘see-saw nystagmus’ OR ‘pendular seesaw nystagmus’ OR ‘jerk seesaw nystagmus’ OR ‘hemi-seesaw nystagmus’. Publications were identified and included if they presented a novel patient case of SSN. Studies without an English translation were excluded. Other exclusion criteria included articles that discussed pathophysiology without a case presentation, focused on infantile nystagmus, or review articles without case presentations. A total of 29 unique SSN cases were identified.3–30 This paper is in compliance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki as amended in 2013. IRB review and approval was not required given the scope of this project. This case report is also in compliance with HIPAA for the collection and evaluation of protected patient health information.
Case report
A previously healthy patient in their 40s was referred for a 2-year history of blurred vision in both eyes, left greater than right. They reported diminished peripheral vision bilaterally, intermittent horizontal diplopia, and headaches without transient visual obscurations, pulsatile tinnitus, or other neurological deficits. The review of the systems was otherwise unremarkable.
On initial examination, visual acuity was 20/40 in the right eye (OD) and 20/80 in the left (OS). Intraocular pressure was normal bilaterally. The pupillary examination did not reveal an afferent pupillary defect. Extraocular movements were full, however, the patient displayed pendular SSN (Supplementary Video 1). They had a small angle (4 prism dioptre) exotropia in primary gaze. Ishihara colour plate testing was full (11/11) OD and diminished (3/11) OS. Ophthalmological examination was also significant for bilateral optic disc pallor.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) depicted retinal nerve fibre layer thinning in both eyes. Standard automated perimetry (30–2) identified a bitemporal hemianopia involving fixation (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Standard automated perimetry testing 30 degrees around fixation revealing bilateral temporal hemianopia in the left (a) and right (b) eyes before resection of the pituitary adenoma, and improvement in the visual field deficits 1.5 years following resection (left eye c, right eye d).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and orbits revealed a 2.8 × 2.7× 2.8 cm pituitary macroadenoma abutting the undersurface of the column of the fornix, with superior displacement of the optic chiasm (Figure 2). There was no evidence of cavernous sinus invasion.
Figure 2.

(a) axial T1 post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (b) coronal TI fat-suppressed pre-contrast MRI depicting a pituitary macroadenoma, 2.8 × 2.7 × 2.8 cm in size. There is superior displacement of the optic chiasm. The lesion abuts the undersurface of the column of the fornix.
Endocrine evaluation revealed secondary hypothyroidism, otherwise normal hormone function. The patient underwent an endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach for resection of the pituitary adenoma, and no evidence of residual tumour was identified post-operatively. Histopathological analysis was consistent with a non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Their nystagmus resolved immediately after surgery during hospitalisation. A video was obtained when they were evaluated 13 days following surgery (Supplementary Video 2). The patient was evaluated 1.5 years following the surgical resection and was found to have improvement in the bitemporal hemianopia (Figure 1), and an MRI revealed complete resolution of the lesion with post-surgical changes (Figure 3). Additionally, the nystagmus remained fully resolved.
Figure 3.

(a) axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (b) coronal T1 MRI depicting post-surgical changes and resolution of the pituitary macroadenoma 1.5 years following resection of the lesion.
Literature review
The results of the PubMed search of peer-reviewed literature conducted between 2002 and 2022 are presented in Table 1.3–30 The average age of presentation was 42.2 (range 4–68) years old. Common presenting symptoms included oscillopsia (38%), vertigo (28%), symptoms concerning for stroke including gait disturbances, unilateral weakness/paresthaesia, and dysarthria (24%), decreased/blurry vision (21%), headache (17%) and diplopia (14%). The pendular (66%) subtype was more prevalent than jerk (34%) nystagmus. The location of the lesion causing SSN included pathologies of the chiasm (38%), the brainstem (34%), and the cerebellum (10%). Of these, 34% were secondary to neurological infarctions, while 24% were related to mass effect from tumours. Other causes included: trauma (7%); syndromic conditions such as Joubert and VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities) syndrome (17%); inflammatory conditions (7%); radiation (3%); and medication-induced cases (7%). Cases from chiasmal disturbances often presented with bitemporal hemianopia (73% out of those tested; 11/15). The optic discs were noted to be pale or atrophic in 60% of cases, otherwise fundoscopic examinations were normal. Medications suspected of SSN induction included mefloquine and oxcarbazepine.
Table 1.
Published cases of see-saw nystagmus.
| Reference | Age (years) and sex |
Presenting pattern of the SSN | Anatomical location/cause | Aetiology | Intervention | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pal et al.5 | 5 F | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal compression from a craniopharyngioma | Transfrontal excision | Yes, after 1 month |
| Saluja et al.4 | 4 F | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal compression from a craniopharyngioma | N/A | N/A |
| Nguyen et al.6 | 40 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Achiasma from VACTERL syndrome | Conservative management of hydrocephalus | No |
| Eggenberger7 | 45 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Delayed onset from chiasmal injury after a traumatic brain injury | Gabapentin, baclofen, and clonazepam | Yes, on maintained clonazepam therapy. No improvement with gabapentin and baclofen monotherapy |
| Eggenberger7 | 58 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Delayed onset from chiasmal injury after a traumatic brain injury | Deferred by the patient | No |
| Rudich et al.8 | 37 F | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal hypoplasia from septo-optic dysplasia | N/A | N/A |
| Prakash et al.9 | 29 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Achiasma from VACTERL syndrome | N/A | N/A |
| Hari Kumar et al.10 | 52 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal compression from a pituitary adenoma | Trans-sphenoidal hypophysectomy | Yes, after 3 months |
| Woo et al.11 | 55 F | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal compression from a pituitary macroadenoma | Anterior interhemispheric transcallosal near-total excision | No, after 6 months |
| Moura et al.12 | 50 M | Pendular | Chiasm | Chiasmal compression from a pituitary macroadenoma | Trans-sphenoidal tumour removal | Resolved after a few months |
| Liu et al.13 | 59 F | Pendular | Chiasm | History of a tuberculum sellae meningioma resected 3 years prior to SSN onset | Clonazepam | Improved promptly with clonazepam therapy |
| Oh et al.14 | 47 F | Jerk | Brainstem | Right dorsomedial pontine tegmental lesion | Observation | Improved after 4 days |
| Khan et al.15 | 50 M | Jerk, intermittent | Brainstem | Right lateral medullary infarction | N/A | N/A |
| Choi et al.16 | 46 F | Jerk | Brainstem | Dorsomedial pontine infarction | Antiplatelet therapy | Yes, within 7 days |
| Lee et al.17 | 62 F | Jerk | Brainstem | Left rostral medial medullary infarction | Antiplatelet therapy | Near resolution after 2 months |
| Choi et al.18 | 20 M | Jerk | Brainstem | Bilateral medial medullary infarction | Anticoagulation | No, after 6 months |
| Zhang et al.19 | 62 M | Pendular | Brainstem | Bilateral dorsomedial pons and left thalamus infarction | Antithrombotic therapy | Improved after 2 weeks |
| Man et al.20 | 49 F | Pendular | Brainstem | Right thalamo-mesencephalic infarction | Aspirin and rehabilitation training | Yes, after 2 months |
| Gong et al.21 | 33 F | Jerk | Brainstem | Medullary astrocytoma | Surgical tumour resection | No improvement after 1 month |
| Porta-Etessam et al.22 | 61 M | Pendular | Brainstem | Dorsolateral medullary infarction | N/A | N/A |
| Cakir et al.23 | 45 F | Jerk | Brainstem | Hyperintense lesion in the pons on T2-weighted MRI secondary to SLE | Pulsed IVMP | Improved within 1 week, no recurrence in 1 year |
| Jang et al.24 | 18 M | Jerk | Brainstem | Midbrain-hindbrain malformation in the setting of Joubert syndrome | N/A | N/A |
| Quisling et al.3 | 64 M | Pendular | Mixed | Distant traumatic chiasmal injury with superimposed right lateral pontine infarction | Clonazepam | Improved but not resolved with initial clonazepam dosage; no follow up |
| Sandramouli et al.25 | 33 F | Pendular | Mixed | Suspected radiographically-occult lesion from MS | N/A | N/A |
| Fridman et al.26 | 38 M | Pendular | Mixed | Possible radiation-associated insult 8 years due to external beam therapy for a large mesodiencephalic mass | N/A | N/A |
| Byju et al.27 | 16 M | Pendular | Cerebellum | Cerebellar vermian agenesis from Joubert syndrome | N/A | N/A |
| Lee et al.28 | 68 M | Jerk | Cerebellum | Left cerebellar infarction in the superior cerebellar artery territory involving the superior cerebellar peduncle | N/A | N/A |
| Manto et al.29 | 36 F | Pendular, intermittent | Medication | Mefloquine-induced (subjective oscillopsia development 6 hours after the first dose) | Discontinue Mefloquine | Oscillopsia improved after days and SSN after 1 week |
| Adamec et al.30 | 43 F | Jerk | Medication | Oxcarbazepine-induced | Switched from oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine to carbamazepine | Improved after 1 week |
F = female; IVMP = intravenous methylprednisolone; M = male; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MS = multiple sclerosis; SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus; SSN = see-saw nystagmus; VACTERL = vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities.
Management decisions were based on aetiology including: medical management, such as reduction of stroke risk factors with the initiation of antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation; excision of the offending mass; conservative management; or cessation of the offending medications. Of the cases with follow-up, resolution and/or significant improvement in the nystagmus was seen in most cases (74%) following treatment. In cases of SSN secondary to neurological infarcts, 86% demonstrated either resolution or significant improvement following treatment. Conversely, for cases attributed to a mass aetiology, the rate of resolution or significant improvement was observed to be 50% after lesion excision. Notably, in instances of medication-induced SSN, a complete resolution or significant improvement was observed in 100% of these cases.
Discussion
See-saw nystagmus often co-occurs with bitemporal hemianopia as clinical manifestations of sellar lesions.2 However, SSN can also occur independently of significant field deficits, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology is not isolated to the afferent visual pathways. There are two proposed mechanisms for SSN resulting from afferent dysfunction. A torsional adaptive process that attempts to increase overlap of non-corresponding nasal visual fields may be implicit.31 Additionally, there could also be disruption of the visuo-vestibular connections between the retina and inferior olive.32
Previous isolated reports have described the resolution of SSN and bitemporal hemianopia due to compressive aetiologies.5,33,34 Our patient presented with a sellar mass and afferent visual dysfunction that may have been a contributing factor prompting the development of nystagmus. While the exact mechanism of afferent and efferent contributions to the development of SSN in our patient is unclear, they demonstrated immediate resolution of the nystagmus following resection of the pituitary macroadenoma. Additionally, with 1.5 years of follow-up after the resection we note an improvement in the patient’s bitemporal hemianopia and full resolution of the nystagmus.
Currently, the degree of improvement in both bitemporal hemianopia and nystagmus following treatment of the aetiologies causing SSN remains scarcely reported in the literature. There is remarkable reported improvement in the cases of SSN due to medication (100%) and neurological infarctions (86%), while excision of the causative mass lesion resulted in 50% of cases experiencing improvement. Similarly underreported is information regarding prognosis related to factors such as tumour size, location, and duration of compression. Importantly, other causes of SSN include head trauma, multiple sclerosis, Chiari Type II malformation and intrathecal methotrexate, and these may have differing outcomes.3
In our literature review, we have identified two specific medications: mefloquine and oxcarbazepine as causative agents for SSN. With regards to oxcarbazepine, it is hypothesised that blockade of ion within neurons in the medial longitudinal fasciculus leads to the observed nystagmus. Intriguingly, upon discontinuation of oxcarbazepine, this effect is reversed, resulting in the resolution of the nystagmus.30 Manto et al. reported a case of mefloquine-induced SSN in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. The authors postulate that calcium may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of nystagmus in ataxia patients, and a disturbance in the homoeostasis of the posterior fossa structures may be implicit in this patient specifically, due to the drug’s mechanism of action, which inhibits the calcium release from inositol-1,4,5-phosphate-sensitive stores in the brain.29 Pharmacologically, clonazepam has been proposed as a therapeutic intervention for SSN. Although the exact mechanism remains incompletely elucidated, it is believed to act by augmenting inhibitory GABAergic synaptic transmission.35 This modulation is likely to contribute to the observed improvement of nystagmus seen.
We have reported a case with immediate resolution of SSN after resection of a pituitary macroadenoma causing chiasmal compression. Similar complete resolution of SSN has been described in three previous case reports after tumour resection: one subtotal resection of a craniopharyngioma5 and two total resections of pituitary macroadenomas, but they were noted to have resolution from 1–3 months post-resection.5,10,12 Conversely, Yat-Ming Woo et al. reported a case of SSN which did not resolve following resection of a pituitary macroadenoma.11 Additionally, there was a lack of improvement in the bitemporal hemianopia, which is suggestive of the theory of SSN being secondary to an adaptive process aimed at increasing the overlap between non-corresponding nasal visual fields.
Overall, in our literature review, SSN resolved in 74% of cases after sellar tumour resection. Further research will be important to elucidate if factors such as tumour size, location, and duration of compression may be contributing factors to patient outcomes.
Consent
Written informed consent for publication of their details was obtained from the patient.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
The authors reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Affirmations
Affirmation of compliance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki as amended in 2013, affirmation of compliance with HIPAA for the collection and evaluation of protected patient health information.
Supplementary data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2023.2299763.
References
- 1.Maddox EE. See-saw nystagmus with bitemporal hemianopia. Proc R Soc Med. 1914; 7:12–13. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Galetta S, Volpe NJ, Liu LG.. Volpe, and Galetta’s Neuro-Ophthalmology: Diagnosis and Management. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quisling S, Kardon RH. See-saw nystagmus: 64-year-old male who first noted the onset of oscillopsia five months prior to presentation. EyeRounds.Org. https://eyerounds.org/cases/case23.htm. Published February 21, 2005.
- 4.Saluja G, Samdani A, Bhatia P. See-saw nystagmus in giant craniopharyngioma. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(6):e235435. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-235435. Published June 1, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pal R, Dutta P, Chatterjee D, Ahuja C, Singh A. Pendular see-saw nystagmus: a rare presenting manifestation of craniopharyngioma. Neuroophthalmology. 2020;45(2):126–129. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2019.1693602. Published 2020 Jan 14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nguyen CT, Goh C, Desmond P, et al. Congenital achiasma and see-saw nystagmus in VATER syndrome association with hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;51:63–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eggenberger ER. Delayed-onset seesaw nystagmus posttraumatic brain injury with bitemporal hemianopia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;956:588–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rudich DS, Lesser RL. See-saw nystagmus in a patient with septo-optic dysplasia. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29(3):251–252. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181b21099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Prakash S, Dumoulin SO, Fischbein N, Wandell BA, Liao YJ. Congenital achiasma and see-saw nystagmus in VACTERL syndrome. J Neuroophthalmol. 2010;30(1):45–48. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181c28fc0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hari Kumar K, Singh P. Seesaw Nystagmus. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):e51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1613244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Woo P Y-M, Takemura S, Cheong A M-Y, et al. Pendular seesaw nystagmus in a patient with a giant pituitary macroadenoma: pathophysiology and the role of the accessory optic system. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38(1):65–69. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moura FC, Gonçalves AC, Monteiro ML. Seesaw nystagmus caused by giant pituitary adenoma: case report. Arq NeuroPsiquiatr. 2006;64(1):139–141. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000100030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu X, Wu Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Cui S. Pendular seesaw nystagmus: disappearance with monocular occlusion. J Neuroophthalmol. 2022;42(2):e523–e525. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oh K, Chang JH, Park KW, Lee DH, Choi KD, Kim JS. Jerky seesaw nystagmus in isolated internuclear ophthalmoplegia from focal pontine lesion. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1313–1314. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156905.31773.E1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khan SR, Lueck CJ. Hemi-seesaw nystagmus in lateral medullary syndrome. Neurology. 2013;80(13):1261–1262. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318289dcbe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choi SY, Kim DH, Lee JH, Kim J. Jerky hemi-seesaw nystagmus and head tilt reaction combined with internuclear ophthalmoplegia from a pontine infarction. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(3):456–458. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee SU, Park SH, Jeong SH, Kim HJ, Kim JS. Evolution of torsional-upbeat into hemi-seesaw nystagmus in medial medullary infarction. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;118:80–82. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Choi KD, Jung DS, Park KP, Jo JW, Kim JS. Bowtie and upbeat nystagmus evolving into hemi-seesaw nystagmus in medial medullary infarction: possible anatomic mechanisms. Neurology. 2004;62(4):663–665. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000110186.05217.9b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang Q, Li J. Seesaw nystagmus with internuclear ophthalmoplegia from bilateral dorsomedial pons and left thalamus infarction: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2019;13(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13256-019-2269-3. Published November 29, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Man BL, Fu YP. See-saw nystagmus, convergence-retraction nystagmus and contraversive ocular tilt reaction from a paramedian thalamomesencephalic infarct. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014206851. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-206851. Published November 28, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gong JW, Jiang J, Sun ZH. Jerky see-saw nystagmus in internuclear ophthalmoplegia from a lower pontine lesion. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(5):652–654. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.05.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Porta-Etessam J, Casanova I, Pajuelo B, et al. See-saw nystagmus in a patient with wallenberg syndrome. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29(1):73–74. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181989dc1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cakir A, Duzgun E, Demir S, Aydin A. Jerky seesaw nystagmus with internuclear ophthalmoplegia as the presenting finding in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014;37(10):e157–e159. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jang SH, Choi SY, Jeon H, et al. Hemi-seesaw Nystagmus in Joubert syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci. 2020;47(2):270–272. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2019.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sandramouli S, Benamer HT, Mantle M, Chavan R. See-saw nystagmus as the presenting sign in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2005;25(1):56–57. doi: 10.1097/00041327-200503000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fridman G, Distefano A. Delayed-onset seesaw nystagmus following brain irradiation. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2021;27(2):29–32. doi: 10.5693/djo.02.2020.12.002. Published May 17, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Byju N, Jose J, Saifudheen K, Musthafa M. Molar tooth sign with ataxia and see-saw nystagmus (Joubert syndrome). Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011;14(1):62–63. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.78057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee H, Kim HA. Hemi-seesaw nystagmus in a patient with acute infarction in the superior cerebellar artery territory. J Neurol. 2018;265(5):1219–1221. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8839-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Manto MU. Episodic see-saw nystagmus in spino-cerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA-2). Cerebellum. 2002;1(1):91–92. doi: 10.1080/147342202753203122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Adamec I, Nanković S, Zadro I, Hajnšek S, Habek M. Oxcarbazepine-induced jerky see-saw nystagmus. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(10):1839–1840. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1315-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim SH, Kim HJ, Oh SW, Kim JS. Visual and positional modulation of pendular seesaw nystagmus: implications for the mechanism. J Neuroophthalmol. 2019;39(2):181–185. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nakada T, Kwee IL. Seesaw nystagmus role of visuovestibular interaction in its pathogenesis. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1988;8:171–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kinder R, Howard G. See-saw nystagmus: an unusual sign of lesions near the third ventricle. Am J Dis Child. 1963;106(3):331–332. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1963.02080050333014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Smith J, Mark V. See-saw nystagmus with suprasellar epidermoid tumor. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62(2):280–283. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1959.04220020106015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Currie JN, Matsuo V. The use of clonazepam in the treatment of nystagmus-induced oscillopsia. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(7):924–932. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33640-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
