Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 5;2(9):100641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100641

Table 3.

Unadjusted Changes in KCCQ Among Patients With Complete Follow-Up Data

Overall HG-AS NF-LG AS Classical LF-LG AS Paradoxical LF-LG AS P Value
Overall HG vs NF-LG
Complete KCCQ data 530a (61.6) 245a (66.6) 140 (57.1) 45 (60.8) 100 (57.8)
Baseline KCCQ-12 49.5 ± 24.8 51.3 ± 26.2 51.1 ± 22.2 45.9 ± 27.9 44.3 ± 22.3 0.061 0.918
Follow-up KCCQ-12 73.5 ± 23.3 76.2 ± 23.2 73.3 ± 22.0 68.6 ± 27.1 69.3 ± 22.6 0.032 0.219
ΔKCCQ-12 24.0 ± 24.8 24.9 ± 27.5 22.2 ± 21.6 22.7 ± 25.5 25.0 ± 21.6 0.722 0.318
Complete end point data 615 (71.5) 267 (72.6) 169 (69.0) 53 (71.6) 126 (72.8)
Achieving primary endpoint (1 y survival with ΔKCCQ ≥5) 417 (67.8) 188 (70.4) 108 (63.9) 33 (62.3) 88 (69.8) 0.393 0.189

Values are n (%) or mean ± SD. Baseline, follow-up and ΔKCCQ includes only those with complete KCCQ follow-up. Achieving primary end point includes all patients that had complete endpoint data (death within 1 year or 1-year follow-up KCCQ score); percentages are based on the total number of patients with available end point follow-up data.

AS = aortic stenosis; HG = high-gradient; KCCQ = Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; LF-LG = low-flow, low-gradient; NF-LG = normal-flow, low-gradient.

a

Follow-up KCCQ data were reported for one patient who died within the 1-year follow-up, with available follow-up KCCQ performed at 310 days post-TAVR.