TABLE 5.
Enabler, barriers, and solutions to HBV elimination
| Cascade of care | Enablers | Barriers | Proposed solutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBV screening | |||
| United States | CDC Universal Adult HBV screening recommendation40 | • USPSTF (US Preventive Services Task Force) recommendation not universal, thus no guaranteed insurance coverage • Low awareness among providers • Need for blood draw, lack of point-of-care (POC) diagnostics |
• Implementation of universal screening recommendations • USPSTF updated recommendation for universal adult HBV screening • National Coverage Determination from CMS should follow CDC universal HBV screening recommendation • Automated integration of screening panel into health system EMR (prompts and ordering sets, standing orders) • Expanded provider education (Extension for Community Health Care Outcomes, ECHO) • FDA Class 2 categorization for HBV diagnostic and licensing of point-of-care diagnostics • Electronic health record adult HBV screening prompts/care gaps • Quality metrics to include universal HBV screening (NCQA, NQF, Medicaid Core Set) |
| Canada | Recommendations for universal HBsAg screening of pregnant and HIV or HCV infected persons, otherwise risk-based screening suggested41 | • Recommendations not widely circulated to all health care providers • Awareness of risk profile is narrow (drug use/sexual) such that persons at risk due to birth in an HBV endemic country may be missed • Late diagnoses- patients presenting first time with HCC and decompensated cirrhosis |
• Improved education of frontline health care providers • Promotion of updated primary care guidelines/recommendations for Universal Screening and Vaccination of all Adults by the Canadian Task Force for Preventative Health Care (CTFPHC) • The College of Family Physicians of Canada should provide resources for practitioners • The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) website and recommendations should be updated to Universal Screening instead of risk-based |
| Vaccination | |||
| United States | CDC/ACIP HBV vaccination recommendation for all children and adults < 60 y old42
Inflation coverage reduction act - no cost vaccine sharing with Medicaid |
• Optional/risk-based vaccination for adults 60 y and older confusing for providers • No clear guidance on order of universal HBV vaccination and screening • Not all pharmacists can administer vaccine and vaccine not covered in all pharmacy settings • Many clinicians do not stock vaccine • Vaccine access/coverage challenges |
• Automated integration into health system EMR with accompanied workflow and education • Education for providers and communities, focus on liver cancer prevention of vaccine • Programs to address vaccine hesitancy, partnering with trusted community organizations • Create vaccine demand among communities • Patient navigators to assist with vaccine completion • Updated state policies to allow pharmacy administration and reimbursement without prescription • NCQA’s proposal to add HBV adult vaccination to Measure Year 2025 as a quality metric |
| Canada | Covered under public health care plans for all childhood vaccines. | • Adult vaccination not covered and not recommended • Wide variation in timing of pediatric vaccination • Poor coverage of birth dose vaccination (discriminatory disadvantage for newcomer populations) |
• Leverage engagement with Government decision makers (National Advisory Immunization Committee; Public Health Agency of Canada) and the general public by advocacy and stakeholder organizations to educate, promote awareness, and justify the implementation of universal birth dose vaccination • Leverage the updated national STBBI Action Plan (2024) recommending new innovation and uptake of vaccination (ie, universal birth dose vaccination) |
| Both countries | • Low awareness among providers and communities, vaccine hesitancy • Lack of National Vaccine registry |
Wide dissemination of the recommendation through professional societies and awareness of newer vaccines | |
| Treatment | |||
| Treaters | |||
| United States | • Any physician can write prescription for HBV antiviral • Primary care providers serving at risk communities are often HBV treaters (many at federally qualified health centers [FQHCs]) |
Barriers for nonspecialists treating • Primary care providers (PCP) with limited time per visit • Not familiar with hepatitis B management • Complex eligibility assessment by AASLD guidelines • PCPs not aware of simplified guidelines |
Expand provider education on HBV care and treatment • Start in medical school • Include as core curriculum for family practice and internal medicine residency training • Expand ECHO and other professional training • AASLD partnership with family practice and internal medicine societies for training, training program for hepatitis B and C Create quality measures (National Quality Forum, HEDIS, Medicaid/Medicare) with payment incentives for HBV screening and treatment |
| Canada | Specialist can write prescription for HBV antiviral | • Nonspecialists cannot prescribe • Pharmacare reimbursement programs, lack of expertise, and shortage of primary care providers |
Expand hepatitis B related services, including telehealth, in the provincial primary care and specialist pathways: Alberta: Specialist Link https://www.specialistlink.ca/ Ontario: Ontario eConsult https://otn.ca/patients/econsult/; VIRCAN - https://vircan.ca/ (Toronto area Viral Hepatitis network) Quebec: Réseau québécois de la télésanté HYPERLINK “https://telesantequebec.ca/”https://telesantequebec.ca British Columbia: RACE- http://www.raceconnect.ca/ |
| Treatment Guidelines | |||
| United States | • Management and treatment guidelines published by AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Disease)43
• Simplified HBV management guidance for primary care providers available online44 |
• Largely specialist prescribing, specialty guidelines have high complexity • Simplified HBV management guidance not widely adopted |
• Create and promote simplified management and treatment guidelines • Creation of HBV guidelines from internal medicine or family medicine societies or wider dissemination of already published simplified guidelines |
| Canada | Management and treatment guidelines published by CASL (Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver)45 | Largely specialist prescribing | -Development of primary care version of CASL guidelines. -Work with primary care networks to create a shared care model with specialists. |
| Drug Access and Coverage | |||
| US | 2 oral generics are available (entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate), can go through nonprofit pharmacies | • Inconsistent health insurance coverage of HBV drugs • HBV drugs are often high-tiered on formulary and require prior authorization • Can be very costly for patients • Pharmacy benefit managers have dropped tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy) coverage |
HBV meds should be universally covered and generics should be in low tier formulary to reduce patient cost for insurance company (Single government leverage negotiation bulk pricing with pharmaceutical company) |
| Canada | 2 oral generics are available (entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) | • >100 public prescription drug plans and over 100,000 private plans—with a variety of premiums, copayments, deductibles and annual limits • Pharmacy coverage of entecavir and tenofovir as first-line therapies (remove current recommendations in some plans to use lamuvidine and adefovir) |
National, universal, single-payer, public pharmacare program. First phase of Legislation introduced in Spring 2024 |
| Patient engagement and representation Stigma and Discrimination Quality of life measures | |||
| US | Advocacy groups and patient-serving groups foster patient engagement and document quality of life impact Hepatitis B discrimination protected under Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)46 |
• Little or no formal patient engagement/patient preference in treatment guidelines and national hepatitis efforts • Quality of life indicators not included in management and treatment guidelines • Discrimination continues to occur despite ADA47 |
• Enhanced medical society engagement with patients, create formal inclusion of patient perspective into guidelines • Develop PROs to assess quality of life on and off treatment, and integrate into clinical care/guidelines • Culturally appropriate messaging to reduce stigma • Continued efforts to decrease discrimination (Hepatitis B Foundation Discrimination Registry) • Patient/advocacy/community organizations and programming (Hepatitis B Foundation, Hep B United) |
| Canada | Advocacy groups and patient-serving groups foster patient engagement and document quality of life impact | • No formal patient engagement/patient preference in treatment guidelines • Quality of life indicators not included in management/treatment guidelines |
• Recent studies to investigate barriers and quality of life outcome measures for Canadian patients48,49
• Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides equality rights and protection against discrimination • Patient/advocacy/community organizations (CATIE Canadian Liver Foundation, Action Hepatitis Canada) |
| HCC Surveillance Opportunities to address gaps in early detection and improve outcomes of liver cancer Other50 | |||
| US and Canada | Tools for HCC surveillance are available (Imaging, AFP) Specialty recommendations for HCC surveillance |
• Low implementation and adherence to HCC surveillance • Less than ideal sensitivity and specificity of currently available screening tools • Non-universal terminology and criteria for HCC screening methodologies • Limited data on effective strategies to improve implementation and adherence |
• Increase use of current surveillance tools • Wider adoption of Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (US LI-RADS) for HCC surveillance • Study and validate new screening strategies, including noninvasive biomarkers • Implement provider and patient education • Integrate automated algorithms and reminders into health systems EMR • Create quality metric for HCC screening • Support national coverage recommendations for HCC surveillance (Canadian Task Force on Preventive Healthcare, US Preventive Services Task Force) |
Abbreviations: AASLD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; ACIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; CASL, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CMS, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CTFPHC, Canadian Task Force for Preventative Health Care; ECHO, Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes; EMR, Electronic Medical Record; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; FQHC, federally qualified health centers; HEDIS, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set; NCQF, National Community for Quality Assurance; NQF, National Quality Forum; PCP, primary care providers; PHAC, Public Health Agency of Canada; POC, point of care; PRO, Patient Reported Outcomes; STBBI, Sexually Transmitted and Bloodborne Infection; US LI-RADS, Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems; USPSTF, US Preventative Services Task Force.