Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 25;15:5385. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49640-z

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditionsa

graphic file with name 41467_2024_49640_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry Activating species Base I source Yield of 3a (%)b
1c Tf2O / I2 trace
2 Tf2O / I2 50
3 Tf2O BDMEP I2 69
4 Tf2O BDMEP I2 32
5 Tf2O DBU I2 trace
6 TMSOTf BDMEP I2 n.d.
7 BF3·Et2O BDMEP I2 n.d.
8 (CF3CO)2O BDMEP I2 n.d.
9 Tf2O BDMEP NIS 33
10 Tf2O BDMEP ICl 27
11 Tf2O BDMEP TBAI/NaI n.d.
12d Tf2O BDMEP I2 66
13e Tf2O BDMEP I2 35
14f Tf2O BDMEP I2 83

“n.d.” stands for “not detected”.

Tf2O trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, TMSOTf trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, BDMEP 2,6-Di-tert-butylpyridine, DBU 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, NIS N-Iodosuccinimide, TBAI Tetrabutylammonium iodide.

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2a (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv), activating species (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv), base (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv), CHCl3 (2.0 mL), 60 °C, 3 h, then I source (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added for 18 h. bIsolated yield.

cI source was added at first and stirred at 60 °C for 21 h.

d2a (0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was used.

e2a (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was used.

fCHCl3 (1.0 mL) and Tf2O (0.21 mmol, 1.05 equiv) were used.