Skip to main content
. 2024 May 26;14(6):448. doi: 10.3390/bs14060448

Table 3.

Regression analysis of flow, aesthetic emotion, and ego identity between arts participation and flourishing.

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Flourishing Flow AE EI Flourishing
β SE t β SE t β SE t β SE t β SE t
Gender −0.03 0.81 −0.63 −0.10 1.08 −2.23 * −0.09 0.47 −1.99 * 0.001 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.64 0.43
Age −0.06 0.24 −1.26 −0.04 0.32 −0.84 −0.13 0.14 −2.76 ** −0.05 0.07 −1.15 0.001 0.19 0.03
SFES 0.20 0.22 4.12 *** 0.11 0.30 2.34 * 0.02 0.13 0.45 0.18 0.06 3.79 *** 0.08 0.18 1.92
ALE 0.01 0.91 0.21 0.25 1.21 5.36 *** 0.20 0.53 4.16 *** −0.11 0.27 −2.30 * −0.04 0.75 −1.07
AP 0.10 0.28 1.99 * 0.17 0.37 3.62 *** 0.19 0.16 4.12 *** 0.09 0.08 1.92 −0.03 0.23 −0.86
Flow 0.31 0.01 5.62 *** 0.14 0.03 3.00 **
AE −0.07 0.03 −1.35 0.22 0.07 4.92 ***
EI 0.50 0.13 12.58 ***
F 6.34 *** 17.55 *** 14.98 *** 10.12 *** 39.49 ***
R2 0.07 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.43

Note. SFES = Subjective family economic status; ALE = Art-learning experience; AP = Arts participation; AE = Aesthetic emotion; EI = Ego identity; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.