Skip to main content
. 2024 May 29;13(6):506. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060506

Table 2.

Retrospective observational studies comparing cefiderocol with colistin-based regimen in ICU patients with CRAB.

Pascale et al. [32]
Multicentre
(January 2020–April 2021)
Mazzitelli et al. [33]
Single-Centre
(August 2020–July 2022)
Falcone et al. [10]
Single-Centre
(January 2020–August 2021)
Russo et al. [11]
Single-Centre
(March 2020–August 2022)
Population:
antibiotic-based regimen groups
107 patients:
42 CFD
65 COL
111 patients:
60 CFD
51 COL
124 patients:
47 CFD
77 COL
73 patients:
19 CFD
54 COL
COVID-19 coinfection 100% 32% 38.7% 100%
Site of infection BSI (58%)
LRTI (41%)
Others (1%)
BSI (47.7%)
Pneumonia (52.3%)
BSI (57.4%)
VAP (25.5%)
Others (17%)
VAP and concomitant BSI (100%)
Patients received CFD in combination 0 30 (50%) 33 (70%) 19 (100%)
Main agents co-administered with CFD / TGC (18/30)
MEM (13/30)
FOS (8/30)
TGC (21/33)
FOS (8/33)
FOS (7/19)
FOS + TGC (7/19)
TGC (1/19)
28–30 day all-cause mortality:
CFD group
vs.
COL group
23 (55%)
vs.
38 (58%)
(p-value: 0.7)
26 (51%)
vs.
22 (37%)
(p-value: 0.13)
16 (34%)
vs.
43 (56%)
(p-value: 0.018)
6 (31.5%)
vs.
53 (98%)
(p-value < 0.001)

Legend. ICU: intensive care unit; CRAB: carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; CFD: cefiderocol; COL: colistin; BSI: bloodstream infection; LRTI: low respiratory tract infection; VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia; TGC: tigecycline; MEM: meropenem; FOS: fosfomycin.