Table 2.
Results of RoBMAs in the school setting for PA, SB, their determinants and the associated heterogeneity and publication bias assessments
n | Effect size estimates (95%CI) | BF10 | |
---|---|---|---|
MA – Friendship quality (Fig. 2a) | 2 | 0.08 (-0.35, 0.44) | 0.20a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.18 (0.05, 0.57) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.90 | |
MA – Intentions (Fig. 2b) | 3 | 0.04 (-0.33, 0.34) | 0.14a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.15 (0.04, 0.45) | - | |
Publication bias | 0.98 | ||
MA – Autonomous motivation (Fig. 2c) | 4 | -0.02 (-0.33, 0.24) | 0.10b |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.16 (0.04, 0.43) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.63 | |
MA – Controlled motivation (Fig. 2d) | 4 | -0.06 (-0.42, 0.28) | 0.14a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.23 (0.05, 0.57) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.64 | |
MA – Basic psychological needs (Fig. 2e) | 2 | -0.01 (-0.34, 0.28) | 0.08b |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.10 (0.03, 0.31) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.60 | |
MA – Self-efficacy (Fig. 2f) | 5 | 0.05 (-0.09, 0.18) | 0.09b |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.09 (0.03, 0.20) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.73 | |
MA – Social support by peers (Fig. 2g) | 3 | 0.04 (-0.25, 0.30) | 0.11a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.11 (0.03, 0.34) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 1.39 | |
MA – Perceived autonomy support (Fig. 2h) | 2 | 0.18 (-0.95, 1.07) | 0.59 |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.54 (0.08, 1.75) | - | |
Publication bias | 1.59 | ||
MA – Perceived barriers to PA (Fig. 2j) | 2 | 0.08 (-0.55, 0.52) | 0.23a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.18 (0.04, 0.63) | - | |
Publication bias | 1.28 | ||
MA – Enjoyment (Fig. 2k) | 2 | 0.05 (-0.55, 0.56) | 0.24a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.20 (0.04, 0.75) | - | |
Publication bias | 0.46 | ||
MA—PA (Fig. 3a) | 9 | -0.04 (-0.18, 0.10) | 0.07b |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.11 (0.03, 0.26) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.47 | |
MA—SB (Fig. 3b) | 6 | -0.09 (-0.29, 0.11) | 0.17a |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.14 (0.05, 0.35) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.35 | |
MA – PA follow-up (Fig. 3c) | 2 | -0.22 (-0.77, 0.23) | 0.37 |
Heterogeneity (τ) | 0.19 (0.04, 0.70) | - | |
Publication bias | - | 0.50 |
amoderate evidence for absence of an effect
bstrong evidence for absence of an effect