Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 18;21(6):795. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060795

Table 3.

Study characteristics.

Author/Year Country Aim (Summary) Design Target Population Sample Intervention Type First Nation Authors
Akbar et al. 2018 Pakistan Impact of social capital on recovery. Quantitative Individual N = 450 residents Not stated N
Ali et al. 2021 Australia Develop a holistic and all-hazards Indigenous community-based DRR theory. Qualitative Community N = 20 Empowerment
Strength-based
Y
Araki 2013 Japan Capability building in the local community in actual disaster response and recovery. Qualitative Community Not stated Empowerment
Strength-based
N
Banks et al. 2016 United States Determine implications for community-focused interventions that may enhance recovery for vulnerable populations. Mixed- Method Community N = 12 Not stated N
Baumann et al. 2021 Nepal Map community art in Kathmandu and expert perspectives about the relationship between community art and its impact on health, social cohesion, and community resilience. Qualitative Community N = 19 Well-being N
Becker 2009 India Investigate the effectiveness of a community-based mental health initiative for survivors. Quantitative Community N = 100 Resilience N
Bender et al. 2015 Chile Explore how everyday creative thinking, creative production, and intuitive experiences might have been experienced by survivors. Qualitative Individual N = 97 Resilience N
Block et al. 2019 Australia Describe recovery trajectories in terms of mental health, well-being, and social connectedness. Mixed-Method Community N = 25 (Qualitative)
N = 597 (Quantitative)
Not stated N
Chamlee-Wright et al. 2011 United States Social capital aids in post-disaster community recovery and redevelopment. Mixed-Method Community N = 301 Resilience
Strength-based
N
Clissold et al. 2021 Vanuatu Displacement more broadly illustrates the human impacts of these disasters. Qualitative Individual N = 8 Empowerment
Well-being
Y
Cox & Perry 2011 Canada Discourse of disaster recovery and the social–psychological processes that were constituted by and constitutive of this discourse. Qualitative Community N = 4 Other—discourse analysis N
Dionisio & Pawson 2016 New Zealand and Japan Overview of the two disasters, their contexts and key issues, and analyses of community-driven projects. Qualitative Community N = 2 Resilience N
Easthope & Mort 2014 United Kingdom How people recover from disasters, so that the recovery itself becomes a form of social change. Qualitative Community Not stated Resilience N
Harms et al. 2021 Australia Focused on two key areas in medium- to high-affected communities, relating to community members’ perceptions of (1) what caused the biggest problems for them in their recovery and (2) what was the most useful support. Qualitative Community N = 811 Well-being N
Harvey et al. 2007 USA Measure the mental health outcomes for participants in the Hurricane Choir. Mixed-Method Community N = 127 Other—choir N
Heinz et al. 2021 USA Inform the science and practice of disaster mental health outreach for other communities. Mixed-Method Community N = 160 Other—Mind Body Yoga and SPR N
Johnston et al. 2012 New Zealand Role of community participation in reducing anxiety and trauma in communities during two New Zealand earthquakes. Mixed-Method Not clear N = 160 Resilience N
Ku & Dominelli 2018 China Marginalised groups be empowered and encouraged to participate in community design, planning, and building processes. Qualitative Community Not stated Empowerment N
Ku & Ma 2015 China Build individual and community capacity for post-disaster social reconstruction in the affected area through the action research process. Qualitative Community Not stated Empowerment N
Lalani et al. 2021 Canada Explored various meanings and concerns, along with tools and strategies that helped to nurture spiritual resilience and well-being among residents. Qualitative Community N = 30 Other—spiritual N
Leadbeater 2013 Australia Importance of locally-endorsed community leaders in the complex, post-disaster environment. Qualitative Community N = 30 Resilience N
Linton 2017 Nepal Implementation and use of art therapy in the context of emergency and immediate post-emergency phases after a natural disaster. Qualitative Community Not stated Other—art therapy N
Mann et al. 2021 Japan Explore the well-being of displaced residents in order to gain an understanding of the challenges they face, successes in overcoming these challenges, and potential future obstacles. Qualitative Community N = 380 Resilience
Well-being
N
Mohr 2014 Peru Determine whether the reported positive effects of an art therapy intervention continued over long-term recovery. Qualitative Community N = 11 Empowerment
Other—art therapy
N
Onstad et al. 2013 USA Community sustainability after natural disasters depends on adaptive capacities of individuals, families, and businesses. Qualitative Community N = 44 Other—life story N
Osofky et al. 2018 USA Describe the development of the St. Bernard Parish YLP and evaluate if the program was associated with increasing self-efficacy and decreasing trauma symptoms. Quantitative Individual N = 137 Empowerment
Resilience
Other—self-efficacy
N
Rawson 2016 New Zealand Translational process from this research to the creation of Te Waioratanga, which loosely translates to mean the activation of wellbeing. Qualitative Individual N = 32–48 Strength-based Y
Rivera-Munoz et al. 2020 New Zealand Development of a critical theoretical understanding of community resilience as an inherently political concept. Qualitative Community N = 15 Resilience N
Scott et al. 2017 Australia Adaptation for Recovery project was evaluated to determine if the project contributed to community ideas of resilience. Qualitative Community Not stated Empowerment
Resilience
N
Silver & Martin 2015 Canada Examines the impacts of the F3 tornado that struck the commercial and civic heart of the community. Mixed-Method Individual N = 35
N = 238
Not stated N
Stofferahn, C. Australia Community characteristics allowed Northwood to recover so quickly from a natural disaster. Qualitative Community N = 22 Resilience N
Storr & Haeffele-Balch 2012 USA Focus on the recovery efforts of Broadmoor after Hurricane Katrina. Mixed-Method Community N = 300
N = 103
Resilience
Social Capital
N
Tamasese et al. 2020 Samoa Community-based single-session group intervention designed to address psychosocial needs of Samoan young people following a tsunami. Qualitative Community N = 1295 Resilience
Strength-based
Well-being
Y
Tudor et al. 2015 New Zealand The emergence of the crafting movement in Christchurch post-earthquake. Qualitative Community N = 9 Other—crafting N
Vallance 2011 New Zealand Strategies three community groups in Christchurch used in their collective response to the first of the major earthquakes. Qualitative Community N = 37 Not stated N
van Kessel et al. 2015 Australia Explore lay perspective, the nature of interventions that aid resilience in people who have experienced a disaster in the Australian context. Qualitative Individual N = 19 Not stated N