Skip to main content
. 2024 May 30;15(6):401. doi: 10.3390/insects15060401

Table 3.

Percentage means, and incidence rate ratio (IRR) of female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes captured in Bagamoyo.

Trap N n %Mean IRR (95% CI) p-Value
AGO vs. GAT
AGO 50 106 1.47 (1.30, 1.68) 1
GAT 50 266 1.97 (1.72, 2.25) 2.58 (1.90, 3.50) <0.001
Grass vs. Yeast
Grass 50 211 1.85 (1.63, 2.11) 1
Yeast 50 161 1.66 (1.42, 1.94) 0.72 (0.52, 0.98) 0.037
BGS vs. Gravid traps
BGS + BG lure 50 926 6.27 (4.84,8.14) 1
GAT + Dry grass 50 147 2.16 (1.80, 2.60) 0.16 (0.11, 0.23) <0.001
GAT + Yeast 50 119 1.77 (1.44, 2.18) 0.13 (0.09, 0.19) <0.001
AGO + Dry grass 50 64 1.49 (1.27, 1.75) 0.07 (0.05, 0.11) <0.001
AGO + Yeast 50 42 1.46 (1.17, 1.84) 0.04 (0.03, 0.07) <0.001

N = number of replicates, n = number of mosquitoes captured, %Mean = percentage geometric mean of mosquitoes captured daily by trap with 95% confidence interval, IRR (95% CI) = incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence interval.