Table 3.
Complete Model Pairwise Comparisons
Difference of Means | St Err | P-value | CI 95% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
TASIT_PE | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –0.896* | 0.458 | .048 | –1.794 | –0.001 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | –0.606 | 0.538 | .260 | –1.662 | 0.450 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –1.668* | 0.474 | .000 | –2.598 | –0.739 |
SCZ vs DEL | 0.290 | 0.312 | .353 | –0.322 | 0.902 |
SCZ vs HCs | –0.772* | 0.130 | .000 | –1.027 | –0.517 |
DEL vs HCs | –1.062* | 0.329 | .001 | –1.706 | –0.417 |
TASIT_NE | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –0.558 | 0.603 | .355 | –1.742 | 0.625 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | –1.220 | 0.710 | .086 | –2.612 | 0.172 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –1.779* | 0.625 | .004 | –3.005 | –0.554 |
SCZ vs DEL | –0.662 | 0.412 | .108 | –1.469 | 0.146 |
SCZ vs HCs | –1.221* | 0.171 | .000 | –1.557 | –0.886 |
DEL vs HCs | –0.559 | 0.433 | .197 | –1.409 | 0.291 |
TASIT_SI | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –0.649 | 0.962 | .50 | –2.535 | 1.238 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | 0.295 | 1.131 | .794 | –1.924 | 2.514 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –0.778 | 0.996 | .435 | –2.731 | 1.176 |
SCZ vs DEL | 0.944 | 0.656 | .150 | –0.343 | 2.230 |
SCZ vs HCs | –0.129 | 0.273 | .636 | –0.664 | 0.406 |
DEL vs HCs | –1.073 | 0.691 | .121 | –2.427 | 0.282 |
TASIT_SS | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –1.038 | 0.926 | .262 | –2.855 | 0.778 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | –3.375* | 1.090 | .002 | –5.512 | –1.237 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –4.474* | 0.959 | .000 | –6.356 | –2.592 |
SCZ vs DEL | 2.336* | 0.632 | .000 | –3.576 | –1.097 |
SCZ vs HCs | –3.436* | 0.263 | .000 | –3.951 | –2.920 |
DEL vs HCs | –1.100 | 0.665 | .099 | –2.404 | 0.205 |
TASIT_PS | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –2.385* | 1.023 | .020 | –4.392 | –0.378 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | –1.197 | 1.204 | .320 | –3.557 | 1.164 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –5.617* | 1.060 | .000 | –7.695 | –3.538 |
SCZ vs DEL | 1.188 | 0.698 | .089 | –0.181 | 2.557 |
SCZ vs HCs | –3.232* | 0.290 | .000 | –3.801 | –2.662 |
DEL vs HCs | –4.420* | 0.735 | .000 | –5.861 | –2.979 |
TASIT_LI | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –0.090 | 1.264 | .943 | –2.569 | 2.388 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | 1.657 | 1.487 | .265 | –1.259 | 4.573 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –2.949* | 1.309 | .024 | –5.516 | –0.381 |
SCZ vs DEL | 1.747* | 0.862 | .043 | 0.056 | 3.438 |
SCZ vs HCs | –2.859* | 0.359 | .000 | –3.562 | –2.155 |
DEL vs HCs | –4.605* | 0.908 | .000 | –6.386 | –2.825 |
TASIT_SE | |||||
DelSCZ vs SCZ | –1.492 | 1.289 | .247 | –4.020 | 1.037 |
DelSCZ vs DEL | –3.355* | 1.516 | .027 | –6.330 | –0.381 |
DelSCZ vs HCs | –5.756* | 1.335 | .000 | –8.375 | –3.137 |
SCZ vs DEL | –1.864* | 0.879 | .034 | –3.589 | –0.139 |
SCZ vs HCs | –4.265* | 0.366 | .000 | –4.982 | –3.547 |
DEL vs HCs | –2.401* | 0.926 | .010 | –4.216 | –0.585 |
* Difference of mean statistically significant (P < .05); significant P-values in bold. CI, confidence interval; St. Err., standard error; TASIT scales: TASIT_PE, positive emotions; TASIT_NE, negative emotions; TASIT_SI, sincere; TASIT_SS, simple sarcasm; TASIT_PS, paradoxical sarcasm; TASIT_LI, lie; TASIT_SE, enriched sarcasm; Groups: DEL, 22q11.2DS group; DEL_SCZ, 22q11.2DS and schizophrenia group; HCs, healthy controls; SCZ, schizophrenia group.