Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 8;16(12):1812. doi: 10.3390/nu16121812

Table 1.

Characteristics of survey respondents and their Californian school food authorities (n = 431) 1.

Title n %
School Nutrition Director/Foodservice Director 274 63.9
School Nutrition Supervisor/Manager/Coordinator 97 22.6
Other 58 13.5
Years in the role at SFA n %
Less than 1 year 58 13.5
1–4 years 147 34.2
5–9 years 111 25.8
10 or more years 114 26.6
Percentage of schools participating in CEP or Provision 2/3 n %
None 118 27.6
1–24% of schools 22 5.1
25–74% of schools 27 6.3
75–99% of schools 17 4.0
All schools 244 57.0
The first year of participation in CEP or Provision 2 or 3, among those participating in one of those n %
School year 2019–2020 or earlier 192 64.2
In the school year 2022–2023 107 35.8
Enrollment size n %
Small (2499 or fewer students) 236 54.9
Medium (2500–9999 students) 120 27.9
Large (10,000 or more students) 74 17.2
Free and reduced-price meal (FRPM) eligibility n %
Low FRPM eligibility (less than 40% of students) 132 31.1
High FRPM eligibility (40% or more of students) 292 68.9
Urbanicity 2 n %
Urban 275 64.0
Not urban 155 36.1

1 Sample size varies for some questions due to missing survey responses. 2 Urbanicity was determined using the reported zip code and based on the 2010 USDA rural–urban commuting area (RUCA) codes, and it was dichotomized into urban (RUCA primary code = 1) and non-urban (RUCA primary codes = 2–10) [26]. SFA: school food authority; CEP: Community Eligibility Provision.