Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 8;16(12):1812. doi: 10.3390/nu16121812

Table 2.

Benefits of implementing California’s USM policy during the SY 2022–2023, as reported by Californian school food authorities, stratified by FRPM eligibility and enrollment size.

Change FRPM Eligibility 1 Enrollment Size 2
Low
(n = 120)
High
(n = 262)
p-Value Small
(n = 207)
Medium
(n = 110)
Large
(n = 68)
p-Value
n % n % n % n % n %
Changes that most reported as having increased 3
Foodservice revenues 76 63.3 176 67.2 0.46 113 54.6 85 77.3 55 80.9 0.0001 a,b
School meal participation 92 76.7 154 58.8 0.001 129 62.3 72 65.5 46 67.7 0.69
Changes that most reported as having decreased 4
Stigma for low-income students 49 40.8 70 26.7 0.01 48 23.2 41 37.3 30 44.1 0.001 a,b
Unpaid meal charges/debt 52 43.3 107 40.8 0.65 74 35.8 50 45.5 37 54.4 0.02 b

1 Free or reduced-price meal (FRPM) eligibility was defined as SFAs with low FRPM eligibility (40% or fewer FRPM students) vs. high FRPM eligibility (SFAs with more than 40% FRPM students) in the SY 2022–2023. 2 Enrollment size was defined as small (≤2499 students), medium (2500 to 9999 students), and large (≥10,000 students). p-values for size represent the overall effect of enrollment size. The statistical significance for pairwise comparisons is indicated as follows: a difference between medium and small SFAs; b difference between large and small SFAs; no significant differences were observed between medium and large SFAs. 3 Frequencies representing SFAs that identified the changes as having increased slightly or greatly. Other answer options were: “no change”, “decreased slightly”, and “decreased greatly”. 4 Frequencies representing SFAs that identified the changes as having decreased slightly or greatly; other answer options were: “no effect”, “increased slightly”, and “increased greatly”.