Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 26;24:768. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12519-9

Table 2.

Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis regarding overall survival

Univariate Cox Regression Multivariate Cox Regression adjusted fora
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-value
Overall survival
 SARIFA 1.570 (1.082–2.278) 0.018 1.637 (1.103–2.429) 0.014
 Age 1.032 (1.012–1.053) 0.002
 Grading 2.159 (1.553–3.000)  < 0.001 2.042 (1.465–2.847)  < 0.001
 Sex 0.976 (0.687–1.386) 0.891
 L 1.089 (0.747–1.588) 0.659 1.003 (0.676–1.489) 0.987
 V 1.447 (0.926–2.262) 0.105 1.256 (0.787–2.004) 0.340
 n 1.386 (0.829–2.318) 0.213
 pT 1.241 (0.922–1.672) 0.154 1.255 (0.902–1.747) 0.178
 pN 1.190 (0.930–1.522) 0.166 1.185 (0.926–1.517) 0.178
 Adjuvant therapy 0.313 (0.202–0.485)  < 0.001
 cM 0.881 (0.619–1.256) 0.484
 R 1.312 (0.919–1.873) 0.135

CI Confidence interval, L Lymphovascular invasion, V Vascular invasion, Pn Perineural invasion, pT Pathological assessment of extension of primary tumour (according to the 8th UICC staging system), pN Pathological assessment of lymph node metastasis (according to the 8th UICC staging system), cM Distant metastasis, R Residual tumour

aThe multivariate model was adjusted for SARIFA, grading, pT, pN, L, and V