Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Neurol. 2024 May 17;44(3):281–297. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787046

Table 2.

Large hemispheric infarct management: cerebral edema treatment

Trials (chronological) Patient sample and intervention Major findings Reported limitations
Medical management
 Qureshi et al (1998)65
  • 27 patients with cerebral edema including patients with head trauma (n = 8), postoperative edema (n = 5), nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (n = 8), and cerebral infarction (n = 6)

  • IV infusion of 3% saline/acetate to increase serum sodium concentrations to 145–155 mmol/L

  • A reduction in mean ICP within the first 12 h correlating with an increase in the serum sodium concentration was not in patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction

  • In patients with head trauma, the beneficial effect of hypertonic saline on ICP was short-lasting, and after 72 h of infusion, four patients required IV pentobarbital due to poor ICP control

  • In repeat CT scan within 72 h of treatment lateral brain displacement was not reduced in nontraumatic ICH or cerebral infarction patients

  • Retrospective chart review

  • Small patient population of each group and the heterogeneity in the underlying neurological illness

 Schwarz et al (1998)62
  • 9 patients with elevated ICP after acute space-occupying hemispheric stroke (n = 8) or hypertensive putaminal hemorrhage with massive perifocal edema (n = 1)

  • IV infusion of 100mL HS–HES or 40 g mannitol over 15 min

  • ICP decreased from baseline values in both groups (p < 0.01)

  • The maximum ICP decrease was 11.4 mm Hg (after 25 min) in the HS–HES-treated group and 6.4 mm Hg (after 45 min) in the mannitol-treated group.

  • There was no constant effect on cerebral perfusion pressure in the HS–HES-treated group, whereas cerebral perfusion pressure rose significantly in the mannitol-treated group

  • Small sample size

 Schwarz et al (2002)63
  • 8 patients with elevated ICP after acute space-occupying hemispheric stroke (n = 6) or supratentorial hemorrhage with massive perifocal edema (n 2)

  • IV 75 mL hypertonic (10%) saline, if standard treatment of 200 mL of 20% mannitol was not effective

  • No constant effect on mean arterial blood pressure, whereas cerebral perfusion pressure was consistently increased

  • Blood osmolarity rose by 9 mmol/L and serum sodium by 5.6 mmol/L. Potassium levels, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and pH were slightly decreased. No unexpected side effects were noted

  • Small sample size

 Gondim et al (2005)66
  • 95 patients treated with mannitol to determine if MI-AKI is linked to elevated osmolality

  • 11 patients (11.6%) who developed MI-AKI did not have significant differences in patient age, sex, or race; history of cerebrovascular disease or smoking; baseline renal function; or GCS compared with those without MI-AKI

  • Renal function spontaneously returned to baseline in all patients

  • MI-AKI appears to be associated with history of chronic disease that affects renal function, e.g., diabetes mellitus rather than mannitol dose or osmolality

  • Addresses only the renal effects of increased osmolality and not the hyperosmolar effect in central nervous system function

 Harutjunyan et al (2005)61
  • 40 patients at risk of increased ICP were randomized to receive either 7.2% NaCl/HES 200/0.5 (NaCl/HES) or 15% mannitol targeting ICP < 15mm Hg. Of them, 17 patients received the NaCl/ HES regimen, 15 received the mannitol regimen, and 8 patients did not require treatment due to their ICP not going over 20mm Hg

  • Both treatment regimens lowered ICP below 15 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). The NaCl/HES lowered the ICP within a median of 6.0 min while the mannitol within a median of 8.7 min (p < 0.0002)

  • The NaCl/HES caused a pronounced decrease in ICP than mannitol (57% vs 48%; p < 0.01). Cerebral perfusion pressure was increased from a median 60 to 72 mm Hg by infusion with NaCl/HES (p < 0.0001) while with the mannitol regimen increased from a median 61 to 70 mm Hg with mannitol (p < 0.0001)

  • The mean arterial pressure was increased by 3.7% from NaCl/HES 200/0.5 and was not altered by mannitol

  • Small patient population of each group and the heterogeneity in the underlying neurological illness

 Hauer et al (2011)64
  • 100 patients with severe ICH signs of increased ICP received a continuous infusion of 3% hypertonic saline within ≤72 h after symptom onset over a mean period of 13 d

  • The findings were compared previously treated control group (n = 115) with equal underlying disease

  • Fewer episodes of critically elevated ICP (92 vs. 167; p = 0.027) in fewer patients (50.0 vs. 60.0%; p = 0.091) and in-hospital mortality was significantly decreased (17.0 vs. 29.6%; p = 0.037)

  • Pilot character of study

  • Compared findings with a previous cohort with known outcomes risk of bias

  • Heterogeneous patient cohort with three different pathologies of cerebrovascular diseases

 Lin et al (2015)67
  • 432 patients of whom 62.3% had ischemic stroke, received mannitol treatment

  • The incidence of MI-AKI was 6.5% (95% CI, 4.5–9.3%) in acute stroke patients, 6.3% in patients with ischemic stroke, and 6.7% in patients with ICH

  • Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes, lower eGFR at baseline, higher baseline NIHSS, and use of diuretics increased the risk of MI-AKI

  • Decision to initiate osmotic therapy and the dose depended only on the treating physician’s expertise

  • Retrospective nature of the study that cannot exclude missing data in the analysis

  • The causative relationship between concurrent medications and the development of MI-AKI were not easily clarified

 Sheth et al (2016)69
  • 86 patients with anterior circulation LHI within 10 h from onset assigned to placebo or IV glyburide in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

  • At 90 d, 17 (41%) patients in the IV glyburide group and 14 (39%) in the placebo group had an mRS 0–4 without surgery (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32–2.32; p = 0.77)

  • Enrollment was stopped because of funding reasons

Surgical management
 Jüttler et al (2007)71
  • 32 patients were randomized to either surgical plus conservative treatment or to conservative treatment alone in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial and patients

  • At 30 d, 88% patients in surgery group survived compared with 47% patients in medical therapy group (p = 0.02)

  • 81% of patients originated from two centers

  • Possibility of bias introduced due to nonblinding of evaluation of clinical outcome

 Vahedi et al (2007)72
  • 38 patients in a multicenter, randomized trial in France involving patients with large MCA infarction comparing functional outcomes with or without surgery

  • The proportion of patients with a mRS ≤3 at the 6-mo and 1-y follow-up was 25 and 50%, respectively, in the surgery group compared with 5.6 and 22.2%, respectively, in the no-surgery group (p = 0.18 and 0.10, respectively)

  • There was a 52.8% absolute reduction of death after craniectomy compared with medical therapy only (p < 0.0001)

  • The trial stopped because of slow recruitment

 Hofmeijer et al (2009)70
  • 64 patients were included; 32 were randomly assigned to surgical decompression and 32 to best medical treatment

  • Patients with LHI with cerebral edema were randomly assigned within 4 d of stroke onset to surgical decompression or best medical treatment

  • Surgical decompression had no effect on the primary outcome measure (absolute risk reduction 0%; 95% CI, −21 to 21) but did reduce case fatality (absolute risk reduction 38%, 15–60)

  • Unknown number of patients who were screened

  • Possibility of selection bias due to the small number of patients with aphasia in the referral of patients for inclusion in this trial

 Slezins et al (2012)76
  • 28 patients with a malignant MCA stroke

  • Random assignment to surgery plus best medical therapy group or best medical therapy alone

  • 6 patients survived: 5 in the DCE group (none of them was older than 60 y) and 1 in the BMT group (p = 0.03/0.06)

  • All survivors in the DCE group had favorable outcomes. There was no significant difference in the NIHSS and GCS scores between the groups and survivors/nonsurvivors (p > 0.05)

  • Small sample size

 Zhao et al (2012)77
  • 47 patients (n = 24 surgery plus medical treatment vs. n = 23 medical treatment alone) with MCA infarction with cerebral edema in a randomized controlled trial

  • At 6 and 12 mo, reduced mortality was observed in surgery plus medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone (12.5 vs. 60.9%; p = 0.001 and 16.7 vs. 69.6%; p < 0.001, respectively)

  • At 6 and 12 mo, fewer patients had mRS >4 postsurgery (33.3 vs. 82.6%; p = 0.001 and 25.0 vs. 87.0%; p < 0.001, respectively)

  • 63.8% of patients were from one single center

  • Unknown number of patients that have been screened

  • Outcome measurement was based on questionnaires replied by patients’ caregivers

  • No data quality of life, neuropsychiatric status, or aphasia

 Hofmeijer et al (2013)73
  • 20 patients underwent surgery within 48 h of MCA infarction due to life-threatening edema, underwent detailed neuropsychological examination at a median of 14.5 mo after stroke onset

  • Poorer cognitive performance was associated with worse functional outcomes on the mRS scale (b −0.4; 95% CI, −0.6 to −0.1)

  • No differences were observed between operated and nonoperated patients

  • Small sample size

  • Investigator who performed the examinations was not blinded to treatment assignment and functional outcome

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HS–HES, hypertonic saline–hydroxyethyl starch; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; ICP, intracranial pressure; LHI, large hemispheric infraction; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MI-AKI, mannitol-induced acute kidney injury; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.