Skip to main content
Annals of African Medicine logoLink to Annals of African Medicine
. 2024 May 1;23(2):189–193. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_46_23

Evaluation of Electromagnetic Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Dysmenorrhea in Young Women of Basrah

Raya Muslim Al Hassan 1, Nawal Mustafa Abdullah 1,, Ali Mohammad Jawad Al Tawry 2
PMCID: PMC11210727  PMID: 39028168

Abstract

Introduction:

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is a public disease of young female worldwide, it affects their daily performances. Severe recurrent uterine cramps are the main complaints in 90% of adolescents and 50% of reproductive-age females. This study aimed to evaluate the use of magnetic field therapy in the treatment of severe dysmenorrhea grade 3 and provide an encouraging goal to continue daily work without pain.

Methods:

Two hundred and fifty female patients were recruited in this study from gynecological clinics in Basrah, southern Iraq. All had severe dysmenorrhea, patients were subjected to a questionnaire form, Visual Analog Scale, and verbal multidimensional scoring system to determine the pain intensity and grade of dysmenorrhea. Only 38 young females had severe dysmenorrhea grade 3 with ages ranging from 16 to 28 years with a mean age of 22.04 ± 1.43 years and body mass index 23.81 ± 1.94, patients subjected to electromagnetic field therapy (EMFT), two sessions per week for 20 min each for 6 weeks. Three categories were assessed, working ability, associated symptoms, and drugs used. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Results:

The present study showed statistically significant progress (P < 0.05) in reducing pain, rare physical and mental complaints, and improved working ability with no need for drugs in majority of patients.

Conclusion:

EMFT has better results than other methods in relieving pain and symptoms of dysmenorrhea with a settled lifestyle.

Keywords: Electromagnetic therapy, primary severe dysmenorrhea, women

INTRODUCTION

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is a painful recurrent spasmodic uterine cramps started shortly before or at the onset of the cycle with normal anatomy of pelvic region and no gynecological diseases.[1,2,3] It is usually started few months after menarche and probably continues to menopause.[4] PD is not only a common gynecological complaint but also a public health problem among young and adult females, the prevalence is variable in different countries, nearly 90% of young girls and more than 50% of menstruating women are suffering from PD.[5,6] It interferes with the physical, psychological, and social functions resulting in a significant burden on the quality of adolescents’ and young females’ lives.[7]

Women with PD have varying complaints ranging from mild to severe episodes of frequent cramps in lower abdomen, pain radiates to the back or thigh, Fatigue, constipation or diarrhea, frequent urination, sweating, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, headache, tiredness dizziness, emotional and sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression.[8,9]

A combination of several factors involved in the pathogenesis of dysmenorrhea including overproduction or imbalance secretion of prostaglandin F2a, which originates in the secretory endometrium, the release of prostaglandin caused by high levels of oxytocin and vasopressin which is ultimately lead to uterine ischemia and activation of type C pain fibers, uterine contractions and threshold of pain are related to high levels of Prostaglandin F2α and Prostaglandin E2.[10,11]

The diagnosis of PD initially depends on history and physical examination to eliminate any pelvic diseases. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are mandatory in the management of dysmenorrhea by preventing cyclooxygenase enzymes from manufacturing prostaglandins (PGF). Contraceptive pills are also used for the treatment of dysmenorrhea in indicated females.[12] However, none of these can reduce the intensity of pain in majority of cases.

Nonpharmacological mediations are frequently adopted by dysmenorrheaic females such as heat application, pelvic floor aerobic exercises, warm beverages, sleep, massage, acupuncture, and dietary modifications, these interventions were assumed to prevent or minimize menstrual pain by increasing pelvic circulation, decreasing uterine contractions, and activating release of endorphins and serotonin.[13] All have limited effective results.

The new treatment noticed to prevent or reduce remarkably menstrual cramps is magnetic therapy which has been in progress for the last few years. It is safe, noninvasive with no drugs being used.[14] Previous studies deal with pulsated electromagnets of different designs resulting in meaningful pain-related outcomes which have been reported for different pain modalities including chronic pelvic pain in women.[15]

The pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) have been recently considered as one of the most active physical techniques in the treatment of various pathological disorders. Selective neuronal depolarization of resting potential modification of cell membrane enhances blood flow, accelerates tissue repair and eliminates harmful mediators by changing the iron binding mechanism. This, in turn, modifies the release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators.[16]

To the best of our knowledge, studies were nil to investigate the perceived efficiency of different treatments in relieving severe dysmenorrhea pain in young women of Basrah city, therefore this study aimed to evaluate the potential effectiveness of electromagnetic field therapy (EMFT) in the treatment of severe dysmenorrhea grade 3, the outcomes would clarify the strategy of proceeding interferences aiming to educate dysmenorrheaic female on the proper use of electromagnetic therapy with positive impact on their lifestyle later on.

METHODS

The present study was conducted on a total 250 female participants attending gynecological clinics in Basrah City southern Iraq from June 1, 2022 to December 1, 2022. A verbal consent was obtained from each woman before participating in the study and all females were given a full explanation about the procedure and aim of the study. They were asked to complete the questionnaire form related to demographic features, pain intensity, accompanying symptoms, and drugs used. The screening process started by subjecting all females to Visual Analog Scale Which is a graphic rating scale having numerical values placed along the line [Figure 1] and verbal multidimensional scoring system to assess the intensity of pain and the grade of dysmenorrhea Figure 2. Forty-three females were diagnosed to have severe dysmenorrhea (Grade 3) and they were within the inclusion criteria of this study, 5 females did not complete the study and were excluded. Only 38 females with ages ranging from 16 to 28 years old, and body mass index (BMI) 23.81 ± 1.94 kg/m2, were included in the study. BMI is measured by the following equation:[17]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Assessment scales: Visual Analogue Scale, numerical rating scale. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Verbal multidimensional scoring system (VMSS) for assessment of dysmenorrhoea severity

BMI = Weight (kg)/Height (m)²

Therapy by NOVAMAG NT-60 must not be applied on women who have implantable devices and/or instruments within their body, such as metallic implants, or who had pelvic surgery, menstruation, pregnant or feeling pregnancy, cardiac arrhythmia, pacemaker, chronic infections, perineum operation or malignancy, all should be excluded.

The electromagnetic stimulation occurs in the sitting position, patient is fully clothed after the evacuation of the bladder. It works on the pelvic floor by stimulating pudendal nerve and muscles to contract and relax. The recommended treatment by NOVOMAG NT 60 is 12–15 sessions, each session lasts for 20 min, 2 sessions per week and can be applied for 6 weeks [Figure 3]. Data collected were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics Ver 22, mean and percentage were determined using descriptive statistics.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NOVAMAG NT-60 chair

RESULTS

Thirty-eight females with severe PD grade 3 enrolled with a mean age 22.04 ± 1.43 years and BMI 23.81 ± 1.94 as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the participants

Data Mean±SD
Age (years) 22.04±1.43
Height (cm) 161.08±3.54
Body mass (kg) 66.34±5.43
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.81±1.94

SD=Standard deviation

Working ability

Thirty-eight female exhibited work-related limitations before treatment. However, after six weeks, the majority of these females (70%) showed a significant improvement (P ˂ 0.0001),with a shift from grade 3 to grade 0 or 1, indicating a better outcome. In contrast, a minority of female (28%) still experienced work-related disability as indicated in Table 2.

Table 2.

Working ability before and after treatment

Pretreatment Posttreatment P


Grade n Working ability Grade n (%) Working ability
Grade 3 38 Clearly inhibited Grade 0 6 (15.78) Unaffected <0.00001
Grade 1 19 (50) Rarely affected
Grade 2 2 (5.26) Moderately affected
Grade 3 11 (28.94) Clearly inhibited

Systemic symptoms

Regarding systemic symptoms associated with PD, 80% of patients improve with no or rarely have associated symptoms with P value of high significance (<0.00001). Only 20% of females resist treatment as demonstrated in Table 3.

Table 3.

Systemic symptoms before and after treatment

Pretreatment Posttreatment P


Grade n Systemic symptoms Grade n (%) Symptoms
Grade 3 38 Apparent Grade 0 9 (23.68) None <0.00001
Grade 1 None
Grade 2 21 (55.26) Few
Grade 3 8 (21.05) Apparent

Need to analgesia

More than 60% of females improve after treatment with no need for drugs with highly significant P value, only 15% continue with analgesia and about 20% have no shift of grade and poor effect of treatment as shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Need to analgesia before and after treatment

Pretreatment Posttreatment P


Grade n Needanalgesia Grade n (%) Need analgesia
Grade 3 38 Poor effect Grade 0 4 (10.52) None required <0.00001
Grade 1 20 (52.63) Rarely required
Grade 2 6 (15.78) Required
Grade 3 8 (21.05) Poor effect

DISCUSSION

PD has different unfavorable effects on women and community. Gynecological problems related to menstruation in the Middle East have acknowledged little attention and PD is frequently ignored. Women facing severe dysmenorrhea with work disability need intervention and management.[18] Many explanations for this disorder are addressed by overproduction of uterine PGF particularly PGF2α5 with low level of progesterone during the luteal phase, high levels reached in first 2 days facilitating contractions, ischemia, and dysrhythmia, all lead to uterine hyper-contractility, reduced uterine blood flow and increased peripheral nerve sensitivity which ultimately activates pain.[19]

The extent of PGs released after the sloughing process is proportionate to the intensity of the uterine contractions, although analgesics, oral contraceptive pills, and NSAIDs are common treatments for PD but about 20%–25% of cases are not improved and need new strategies such as magnetic therapy to compensate for work disability, this new intervention based on a simple evidence, individuals feel pain when pain impulses in nerves conveyed to the brain by travelling through the body, the magnetic treatments are designed to stop pain impulses from reaching the brain (stop the pain at the source), it is considered the proper choice when electromagnets are placed in the suitable site, the mechanism of action explained as EMFT stimulates the expression of cytokines which is involved in activation of endogenously expressed opioid precursors result in decreasing pain and inflammatory responses.[20]

From the current study, we noticed that using NOVAMAG NT-60 therapy trial is encouraging because of a large number of female who had benefits to continue work, rare symptoms, and minimum drug use as shown in Tables 2-4, working on muscle strengthening increase cortical consciousness, adrenergic activities and decrease cholinergic.[21] There is a significant decrease in pain intensity in grade 3 PD for women treated by electromagnetic field, results come in agreement with many articles dealing with pain control by noninvasive modality such as Maestú et al. who carried a study on females with fibromyalgia.[22] Hedén and Pilla who studied the effect of PEMF on postoperative pain in females breast augmentation.[23] Mohammad et al. found that EMFT is more effective than aerobic exercise in treating PD.[14] Magnetic stimulation provides a new treatment technique for chronic pelvic pain in patients who do not respond to pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, the results are in line with those of Kim et al. who studied the impact of using repetitive magnetic stimulation for both pelvic floor dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain syndrome.[24] Study outcomes would advise the strategy of upcoming interventions aiming to educate females with dysmenorrhea for suitable management protocols.

CONCLUSION

There is sufficient evidence to make magnetic field therapy an advisable treatment of choice for many sufferers of menstrual pain. If it does not work, nothing happens as it is a harmless, noninvasive, and no drug-used therapy. We have seen almost all our participants declare almost immediate pain relief.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate and thank all female patients who collaborate in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Azagew AW, Kassie DG, Walle TA. Prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea, its intensity, impact and associated factors among female students’ at Gondar town preparatory school, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20:5. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0873-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Itani R, Soubra L, Karout S, Rahme D, Karout L, Khojah HM. Primary dysmenorrhea: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment updates. Korean J Fam Med. 2022;43:101–8. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.21.0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharghi M, Mansurkhani SM, Larky DA, Kooti W, Niksefat M, Firoozbakht M, et al. An update and systematic review on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23:51–7. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Omidvar S, Bakouei F, Amiri FN, Begum K. Primary dysmenorrhea and menstrual symptoms in Indian female students: Prevalence, impact and management. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8:53632. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Habibi N, Huang MS, Gan WY, Zulida R, Safavi SM. Prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea and factors associated with its intensity among undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16:855–61. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gebeyehu MB, Mekuria AB, Tefera YG, Andarge DA, Debay YB, Bejiga GS, Gebresillassie BM. Prevalence, Impact, and Management Practice of Dysmenorrhea among University of Gondar Students, Northwestern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Reprod Med. 2017;2017:3208276. doi: 10.1155/2017/3208276. doi: 10.1155/2017/3208276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wong CL. Health-related quality of life among Chinese adolescent girls with Dysmenorrhoea. Reprod Health. 2018;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0540-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karout S, Soubra L, Rahme D, Karout L, Khojah HM, Itani R. Prevalence, risk factors, and management practices of primary dysmenorrhea among young females. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:392. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01532-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Firouzi M, Zahedifard T, Salari P, Mazlom SR. Comparing the pattern of primary dysmenorrhea before and after childbirth. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2019;7:1521–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elrefaye GE. Electromagnetic field versus diclofenac drugs on primary dysmenorrhea: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anal Med. 2019;10:202–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mendiratta V. Primary and secondary dysmenorrhea, premenstrual syndrome, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. In: Lobo RA, Gershenson DM, Lentz GM, editors. Comprehensive Gynecology. 7th. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2017. pp. 815–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aziato L, Dedey F, Clegg-Lamptey JN. Dysmenorrhea management and coping among students in Ghana: A qualitative exploration. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alharbi KK, Alkharan AA, Abukhamseen DA, Altassan MA, Alzahrani W, Fayed A. Knowledge, readiness, and myths about menstruation among students at the Princess Noura University. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7:1197–202. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_279_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mohammad A, Elbandrawy AM, Gabr AA, Abd El Hamed AH. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field versus aerobic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea. Med J Cairo Univ. 2020;88:2165–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown CS, Ling FW, Wan JY, Pilla AA. Efficacy of static magnetic field therapy in chronic pelvic pain: A double-blind pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1581–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.128026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mayrovitz H, Milo B, Alexander B, Mastropasqua M, Moparthi Y. Effects of a concentric rare-earth magnet on menstrual cycle pain: A parallel group randomized pilot study. Cureus. 2021;13:e12801. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shah S, Verma N, Begani P, Nagar H, Mujawar N. Effect of primary dysmenorrhea in young female. Int J Phsiol Res. 2016;4:1658–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Subasinghe AK, Happo L, Jayasinghe YL, Garland SM, Gorelik A, Wark JD. Prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhoea, and management options reported by young Australian women. Aust Fam Physician. 2016;45:829–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith RP, editor, editor. Dysmenorrhea and Menorrhagia: A Clinician's Guide. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2018. Scope of the problems; pp. 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moffett J, Griffin NE, Ritz MC, George FR. Pulsed radio frequency energy field treatment of cells in culture results in increased expression of genes involved in the inflammation phase of lower extremity diabetic wound healing. J Diabet Foot Complications. 2010;2:57–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iacovides S, Avidon I, Baker FC. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: A critical review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:762–78. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maestú C, Blanco M, Nevado A, Romero J, Rodríguez-Rubio P, Galindo J, et al. Reduction of pain thresholds in fibromyalgia after very low-intensity magnetic stimulation: A double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain Res Manage. 2013;18:e101–6.. doi: 10.1155/2013/270183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hedén P, Pilla AA. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on postoperative pain: A double-blind randomized pilot study in breast augmentation patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:660–6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9169-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim TH, Han DH, Cho WJ, Lee HS, You HW, Park CM, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation for treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients who do not respond to pharmacotherapy. Urology. 2013;82:894–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of African Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES