Skip to main content
. 2024 May 25;144(6):2745–2752. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05355-w

Table 3.

Clinical examination and instrumental stability assessment pre- and postoperatively

Parameters Total
(n = 26)
Group A
(n = 12)
Group B
(n = 14)
p-value‡
Maximum Flexion§, in ° n.s.
• Preoperative 130.7 ± 14.4 129.3 ± 15.8 132.0 ± 13.3
• Postoperative 129.1 ± 6.7 131.0 ± 5.1 127.1 ± 7.8
Flexion SSD§, in ° n.s.
• postoperative 8.2 ± 4.9 8.5 ± 4.2 7.9 ± 5.8
Dial test ER SSD§ at 30° Flexion, in ° n.s.
• postoperative 4.1 ± 4.9 4.4 ± 3.1 3.3 ± 6.5
Dial test ER SSD§ at 90° Flexion, in ° n.s.
• postoperative 2.3 ± 3.7 2.8 ± 3.8 1.8 ± 3.7
Varus Stress at 30° Flexion† n.s.
• Preoperative
 • Grade II 26 (100) 12 (100) 14 (100)
;• Postoperative
 • Negative 23 (88.5) 11 (91.7) 12 (85.7)
 • Grade I 3 (11.5) 1 (8.3) 2 (14.3)
 • Grade II - - -
 • Grade III - - -
Posterior Drawer SSD§, in mm n.s.
• preoperative 15.0 ± 2.4 15.1 ± 2.4 14.9 ± 2.4
• postoperative 2.3 ± 1.2 2.6 ± 1.0 2.0 ± 1.4
• Difference of Posterior Drawer (pre- and postoperative) 13.0 ± 2.7 13.1 ± 2.5 13.0 ± 3.1

n = 26; § mean ± SD; † n (in %); ‡ Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test were performed to determine if the data were normally distributed, To compare both groups Student`s t-Test or Mann-Whitney U-Test were performed, Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of binominal data; SD standard deviation; ER External Rotation; SSD Side-to-side difference