Table 6.

Retrospective studies reporting on the safety vasodilator stress CMR perfusion in CIED patients.

Study	Dates	N	Device type [Field Strength]	Adverse events	CIED changes	Key Findings
Klein-Wiele et al.[14]	3/2014-4/2015	24	MR-conditional PPM	None	None	Safety of adenosine stress CMR
Klein-Wiele et al.[80]	4/2015-12/2016	47	MR-conditional PPM	None	None	Safety of tailored PPM programming scheme for adenosine stress CMR
Pezel et al.[83]	Before 10/2021	224	MR-conditional PPM [1.5T]	None	None	Diagnostic quality in 99%, PCI performed in 33/35 (94%) CMR guided ICA referrals, ischemia and LGE were independent predictors of MACE
Pavon et al.[81]	8/2013-3/2021	66	MR-conditional PPM (N = 36), ICD (N = 28), SQ-ICD (N = 2) [1.5T]	None	None	Diagnostic quality in 98%, non-diagnostic quality in patients with SQ-ICD, critical coronary stenoses 6/6 patients with ischemia referred for ICA
Miller et al.[82]	5/2018-9/2021	20	MR-conditional PPM (N = 10) [all at 3T] MR-conditional ICD (N = 8) [2 1.5T, 6 3T] Non-MR-conditional ICD (N = 2) [4 at 1.5T; 16 at 3T]	None	None	Diagnostic quality in 16/18 (89%) for MR conditional, 0/2 (0%) for MR nonconditional.