Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 14;12:1352754. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352754

Table 5.

Benchmark regression results.

Variable Dependent variable: CTFP
(1) (2) (3)
Estimation method OLS RE FE
Constant −0.050 (−0.34) 0.052 (0.23) 7.456** (2.18)
LnDIG 0.344*** (12.99) 0.330*** (13.89) 0.319*** (12.37)
LnPGDP 0.056*** (5.40) 0.045*** (4.31) 0.041*** (3.69)
LnPOP 0.061 (1.40) 0.063 (0.78) −3.030** (−2.56)
LnPOP2 −0.004 (−0.99) −0.004 (−0.51) 0.299*** (2.83)
LnENVR −0.035* (−1.72) −0.059*** (−2.60) −0.065*** (−2.65)
FDI −1.936** (−2.25) −3.074*** (−3.19) −3.131*** (−2.96)
LnST 0.081*** (2.93) 0.033 (1.10) 0.011 (0.34)
R2 0.584 0.675 0.687
OBS 300 300 300
F statistic F(29, 263) = 6.11, Prob>F = 0.0000
Hausman tests chi2(8) = 55.64, Prob>F = 0.0000

The values in parentheses are t-values; *, **, and *** indicate that the estimated coefficients are significant at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively. OLS, RE, and FE represent mixed effects estimation, random effects estimation, and fixed effects estimation, respectively. The asterisks in the following tables have the same meaning as the notes here.