Table 4.
2023 selection gradients (β) on flowering time from the best fit (A) zero-truncated poisson and (B) negative binomial models based on seed number.
| (A) Truncated-Poisson Selection on Flowering Time | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | LG | HG | BCG | F1 | F2 | BCL | HL | LL | All Hybrids | All Geno |
| M. guttatus | - | −0.203 | −0.668* | −0.412 | 0.170 | −0.599 | −0.527* | 0.104 | −0.210 | −0.272* |
| Hybrid | - | −0.247 | −1.912* | −0.733 | 0.724 | −0.391 | −0.548 | - | −0.659* | −0.378* |
| M. laciniatus | - | −0.315 | −0.256 | −0.951*** | −0.715 | −1.443** | −0.304 | 0.243 | −0.735*** | −0.602*** |
| (B) Negative Binomial Selection on Flowering Time | ||||||||||
| Site | LG | HG | BCG | F1 | F2 | BCL | HL | LL | All Hybrids | All Gen |
| M. guttatus | - | −0.091 | −0.123 | 0.039 | −0.111 | −0.28 | 0.111 | - | −0.035 | −0.013 |
| Hybrid | - | −0.241 | −1.025 | −0.152 | 0.312 | −0.413 | 0.097 | - | −0.243 | −0.153 |
| M. laciniatus | - | −0.349 | −0.440 | −0.285 | 0.165 | −0.285 | −0.145 | −0.305 | −0.254 | −0.256* |
β indicates strength and direction of selection while asterisks indicate significance:
p<.05
P<.01
P< .001.