Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Jun 20:2024.06.20.599815. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.06.20.599815

Table 2: Breakdown of mouse and ABR waveform data by lab, model, and train and test splits.

Figures and Tables relevant to a given dataset are enumerated in brackets in the last row.

Lab/Model Peak Detection Automatic Thresholding
Training Data Test Data Training Data Test Data ABRA vs. EPL-ABR
Lab A 40 mice
(286 ABRs)
34 mice
(72 ABRs)
65 mice
(5,419 ABRs)
16 mice
(2,031 ABRs)
Lab B 4 mice
(327 ABRs)
4 mice
(82 ABRs)
83 mice
(12,948 ABRs)
21 mice
(3,276 ABRs)
Lab C 29 mice
(319 ABRs)
7 mice
(77 ABRs)
27 mice
(292 ABRs)
Total [Relevant Figures & Tables] 44 mice
(613 ABRs)
[Fig. 3]
38 mice
(154 ABRs)
[Fig. 6; Table 3]
177 mice
(18,686 ABRs)
[Fig. 4]
44 mice
(5,384 ABRs)
[Figs. 810; Tables 4, 5]
27 mice
(292 ABRs)
[Table 6]