Table 5: Performance comparison of threshold estimation algorithms on Lab C data only (122 ABR waveforms from 2 mice).

This table presents a side-by-side comparison of two threshold estimation algorithms: EPL-ABR and ABRA. The metrics used for comparison include Accuracy, True Positive Rate (TPR), False Positive Rate (FPR), and the ability to estimate thresholds within 5dB, 10dB, and 15dB. The values are presented as mean (± standard error). ABRA demonstrates superior or equal performance (green cells/bolded) in terms of accuracy, TPR, FPR, and estimating thresholds within 5, 10, or 15dB.

Metric \ Software	EPL-ABR	ABRA
Accuracy	95.08 (±1.958)%	96.72 (±1.612)%
True Positive Rate	95.56 (±2.172)%	97.78 (±1.554)%
False Positive Rate	6.25 (±4.279)%	6.25 (±4.279)%
Within 5dB	91.67 (±7.979)%	100.00 (±0.0)%
Within 10dB	100.00 (±0.0)%	100.00 (±0.0)%
Within 15dB	100.00 (±0.0)%	100.00 (±0.0)%