Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 4;34(7):4273–4283. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10516-3

Table 2.

Subjective and objective image quality

Reader 1 Reader 2 p-value
Subjective image quality
Excellent (Likert 1) 23 (52.3%) 16 (36.4%) 0.92
Good (Likert 2) 10 (22.7%) 17 (38.6%) 0.14
Fair (Likert 3) 4 (9.1%) 6 (13.6%) 0.75
Poor (Likert 4) 4 (9.1%) 1 (2.3%) 0.38
Non-diagnostic (Likert 5) 3 (6.8%) 4 (9.1%) > .99
Overall image quality 1 [1–2.3] 2 [1–2.3] 0.38
Objective image quality
  Stent blooming
Measured outer diameter (mm) 3.7 ± 0.7 3.8 ± 0.7 0.02
Measured inner diameter (mm) 2.3 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.6 0.52
Blooming estimate (%) 37.9 ± 9.6 40.1 ± 8.9 0.03
  Stent lumen
Attenuation proximal lumen (HU) 480 [409–499] 468 [396–523] 0.87
Attenuation distal lumen (HU) 455 [378–511] 453 [405–519] 0.13
Attenuation in-stent lumen (HU) 518 [466–601] 496 [425–577] 0.18
∆HU in-stent lumen (HU) 77 [36–106] 18 [− 1 to 100] 0.02

Data are presented as number and frequencies in parenthesis, mean ± standard deviation, and median and interquartile range in square brackets

Abbreviations: mm millimeter, HU average Hounsfield Units