Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD008953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008953.pub2

Summary of findings 11. Erythropoietin versus placebo for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxias.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEPO) for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxias
Patient or population: people with speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxias
 Settings: hospital
 Intervention: rhuEPO
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo rhuEPO
Short‐term (1 week) percentage change (improvement) in overall speech production See comment See comment Not estimable 0
 (0) See comment Not an outcome in this study
Short‐term (within 1 month) change in isolated movement, objective and subjective measures of speech production 
 SARA. Scale from: 0 to 48. Follow‐up: mean 6 months See comment See comment Not calculable 16
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2 Speech subscales were not reported separately to overall SARA scores. No difference between groups
Short‐term (within 1 month) change in quality of life scores related to communication as measured by validated communication assessments See comment See comment Not estimable 0
 (0) See comment Not an outcome in this study
Longer‐term (minimum 1 month) change in generic quality of life scores 
 SF‐36. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate less disability. Follow‐up: mean 6 months See comment See comment Not calculable 16
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low3,4 No difference between groups
Adverse effects (during study) See comment See comment Not estimable 16
 (1 study) See comment No serious adverse events. 3 participants had sideropenic anaemia (2 rhuEPO group and 1 placebo group)
Longer‐term burdens (minimum 1 month) (for example, demands on caregivers, frequency of tests, restrictions on lifestyle) See comment See comment Not estimable 0
 (0) See comment Not an outcome in this study
Economic outcomes See comment See comment Not estimable 0
 (0) See comment Not an outcome in this study
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; rhuEPO: recombinant human erythropoietin; RR: risk ratio; SARA: Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia; SF‐36: Short Form 36 Health Survey
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Speech was not measured directly but as part of an overall clinical severity scale.
 2Speech was measured on a subjective, clinician‐rated, scale.

3Unclear randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding.
 4Magnitude of change is not reported.