Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;43:102791. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102791

Table 5.

Associations between study variables with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in multinomial logistic regression analyses, among study participants who were adult Iraqi citizens with data collected during August–September 2022 (N = 2544).

Model Nagelkerke R2 = 0.128 aOR 6 (95 % CI 7) p value
COVID-19 vaccine uptake vs. no history of COVID-19 vaccination
Sex Male 1.27 (0.97–1.64) 0.079
Female Ref. .
Place of residence Baghdad 0.56 (0.43–0.73) <0.001
Outside Baghdad Ref. .
Occupation HCW 3 1.69 (0.93–3.07) 0.083
Employed (non-HCW) 0.70 (0.52–0.93) 0.015
Unemployed 1.00 (0.62–1.60) 0.985
Student Ref. .
History of COVID-19 Yes 1.53 (1.19–1.97) 0.001
No Ref. .
Income ≤500 K IQD 4 0.66 (0.50–0.88) 0.004
>500 K IQD Ref. .
Misinformation score 1 No belief in misinformation 2.29 (1.45–3.61) <0.001
Slight belief in misinformation 1.49 (1.04–2.15) 0.031
Moderate belief in misinformation 1.08 (0.75–1.54) 0.687
Strong belief in misinformation Ref. .
Attitude towards COVID-19 2 vaccine conspiracy Disagreement (VCBS 5: 7–20) 3.65 (2.16–6.18) <0.001
Neutral (VCBS: 21–35) 2.06 (1.56–2.71) <0.001
Agreement (VCBS: 36–49) Ref. .
Source of information regarding COVID-19 vaccination Physicians, scientists and scientific journals 1.46 (1.10–1.94) 0.009
TV programs and newspapers 1.13 (0.81–1.58) 0.469
Social media platforms Ref. .
1

Misinformation score: Using three items to assess the belief in COVID-19 misinformation

2

COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019

3

HCW: Healthcare worker

4

K IQD: 1000 Iraqi dinars

5

VCBS: Vaccine conspiracy beliefs scale

6

aOR: Adjusted odds ratio

7

CI: Confidence interval. Statistically significant p values are highlighted in bold style.