Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):e11657. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11657

TABLE 4.

Summary statistics of models explaining the timing of flowering with temperature, distribution area, and their interaction (based on the most parsimonious model temperature × distribution area from Table 3) separately for the three study species: Hypericum perforatum, Hypericum maculatum, and Hypericum montanum.

H. perforatum H. maculatum H. montanum
Estimate SE t‐Value p‐Value Estimate SE t‐Value p‐Value Estimate SE t‐Value p‐Value
Intercept 188.27 20.09 9.37 <.001 117.27 16.77 6.99 <.001 158.96 19.90 7.99 <.001
Temperature −4.29 0.85 −5.04 <.001 −1.40 0.70 −2.01 .062 −2.91 0.89 −3.26 .011
Core 2.48 18.68 0.13 .894 66.97 16.75 4.00 <.001 21.80 20.35 1.07 .285
Trailing −8.43 20.03 −0.42 .674 61.91 22.37 2.77 .006 16.01 15.85 1.01 .315
Temperature × Core −0.21 0.77 −0.27 .790 −3.14 0.68 −4.61 <.001 −1.18 0.95 −1.25 .213
Temperature × Trailing 0.20 0.83 0.24 .811 −2.91 1.00 −2.90 .004 −1.18 0.73 −1.62 .108

Note: Estimates, standard errors (SE), t‐values and p‐values are provided.