Table 7.

Ablation study of different pruning methods in ET module on three datasets.

Id	Method	Params (M)	FLOPs (G)	Acc	F1	Precision	Recall	Auc
BUSI
(0)	Baseline	45.8	9.9	0.9133	0.8964	0.9102	0.8869	0.9162
(1)	(0)+ET Module	53.2	11.6	0.9297	0.9259	0.9295	0.9226	0.9386
(2)	(1)+EC Module	25.5	6.4	0.9333	0.9261	0.9326	0.9226	0.9404
COVID19-CT
(0)	Baseline	45.8	9.9	0.8986	0.9057	0.9000	0.9114	0.8977
(1)	(0)+ET Module	53.2	11.6	0.9257	0.9308	0.9250	0.9367	0.9249
(2)	(1)+EC Module	25.5	6.4	0.9257	0.9317	0.9146	0.9494	0.9240
Chaoyang
(0)	Baseline	45.8	9.9	0.8504	0.7940	0.8019	0.7887	0.8689
(1)	(0)+ET Module	53.2	11.6	0.8565	0.8066	0.8229	0.7952	0.8729
(2)	(1)+EC Module	25.5	6.4	0.8635	0.8090	0.8191	0.8012	0.8776

Bold indicates the optimal metric values among all compared methods.