Mandate that all BP devices approved for sale undergo an independent clinical validation study that documents meeting the requirements of an internationally accepted validation standard (ideal state) |
Governments, regulatory authorities |
Stipulate clearly the changes made to a predicate (previously validated) device that should trigger re-validation versus when ‘substantial equivalence’ and a ‘letter to file’ claim can be made |
Regulatory authorities |
Provide an easily accessible list of marketed devices available in a country or region according to clinical validation status, with links to full-text validation study reports |
Governments, regulatory authorities, manufacturers |
Simplify device model nomenclature and avoid unnecessary proliferation of derivative devices or alternative naming of similar models across different regions |
Manufacturers |
Amalgamate validated device listings and promote their existence, importance, and use |
Professional societies, device listing creators |
Educate clinicians and consumers regarding the importance of clinical validation and provide simple visual tools such as universally identifiable seals or marks of approval that identify a clinically validated device at the point of sale |
Governments, regulatory authorities, manufacturers, professional societies, retailers |