Intragumtornchai 1999.
Methods | Design:
Recruitment period:
Median follow‐up:
|
|
Participants | Eligibility criteria:
Patients randomised (n = 107)
Median age:
Gender (male, female):
Country:
|
|
Interventions | IDA arm: IA regimen, 1 cycle
DOX arm: DA regimen, 1 cycle
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes and time‐points from the study that are considered in the review:
|
|
Notes | Published as an abstract Funding: not stated No conflict of interest statement |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients (...) were assigned randomly to" Comment: the study probably had an adequate sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Overall survival | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All other outcomes | High risk | Comment: blinding was not explicitly stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) OS and DFS | High risk | Quote: "Fifty‐four patients were assigned to receive IDR and 53 to DXR. Three patients in the DXR arm were excluded (2. AML, M3, I, ALL). Bone marrow examination was not available in 17 patients ( 8 in IDR and 9 in DXR arm) which were due to death from uncontrolled infection at time of severe granulocytopenia (6, IDR; 6, DXR), stroke on day 13 (1, DXR), hyperleukocytosis on day 2 (1, IDR)and loss to follow‐up (1, IDR; 2, DXR)" Comment: Outcome data in 20 patients (19%) were not available. The review authors judge that this proportion of missing data will be highly possible to induce bias |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: The study has no registered study protocol. The review authors have no information to permit judgement |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information provided |