Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 2;29:355. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01950-0

Table 3.

Odds of having high HDL-C levels (70 mg/dL ≤ HDL-C) compared to having low HDL-C (< 40 mg/dL in men and < 50 mg/dL in women) in the studied population with type 2 diabetes according to the multivariate models

Multivariate OR 95% CI p-value
Model 1a
Height 0.918 0.866–0.974 0.004
SBP 0.941 0.910–0.972  < 0.001
Vitamin D 0.970 0.941–0.999 0.047
Triglyceride 0.992 0.987–0.998 0.008
Model 2b
Height in category Height < 160 cm 1.00 (reference)
Height ≥ 160 cm 0.277 0.127–0.607 0.001
SBP in category SBP < 130 mmHg 1.00 (reference)
SBP ≥ 130 mmHg 0.387 0.190–0.789 0.009
Vitamin D in category Vitamin D < 30 ng/mL 1.00 (reference)
Vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL 0.422 0.205–0.869 0.019
Triglyceride in category Triglyceride < 150 mg/dL 1.00 (reference)
Triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dL 0.352 0.153–0.807 0.013

OR: odds ratio, 95% CI:  95% confidence interval

SBP: systolic blood pressure, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol

aModel 1 was adjusted for height, waist circumference, SBP, Vitamin D, HBA1c, the status of hypertensive drugs, the anti-diabetic drugs, the type of lipid-lowering drug, duration of diabetes, creatinine, and triglyceride concentration

bModel 2 was adjusted for height, SBP, Vitamin D, the status of hypertensive drugs, the anti-diabetic drugs, the type of lipid-lowering drug, duration of diabetes, and triglyceride concentration after dividing into different categories