Table 3.
The mediation model total, direct and indirect effects (Study 2)
Indirect effects | Estimate | P | CI 95% LLCI | ULCI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFP | → | NEED_AUT | → | WE | 0.003 | 0.57 | -0.00 | 0.03 |
PFP | → | NEED_REL | → | WE | 0.051** | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
PFP | → | NEED_COMP | → | WE | 0.048* | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
PFP | → | NEED_AUT | → | Well-being | 0.004 | 0.48 | -0.00 | 0.03 |
PFP | → | NEED_REL | → | Well-being | 0.050** | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
PFP | → | NEED_COMP | → | Well-being | 0.027* | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
Total indirect effects | ||||||||
PFP | → | Work engagement | 0.102** | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.18 | ||
PFP | → | Well-being | 0.082** | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.14 | ||
Direct effects | ||||||||
PFP | → | Work engagement | 0.086* | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.178 | ||
PFP | → | Well-being | 0.042 | 0.40 | -0.061 | 0.147 | ||
Total effects | ||||||||
PFP | → | Work engagement | 0.188** | < .001 | 0.09 | 0.31 | ||
PFP | → | Well-being | 0.124* | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.25 |
PFP pet-friendly practices, WE Work engagement
N = 379; *p < 0.05 ** p < 0.001