Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Mar 8;8(5):945–961. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01826-7

Figure 6. Alignment between feature and performance encoding.

Figure 6.

A) Alignment between encoding of target coherence and performance (top row: Accuracy, bottom row: RT). B) Alignment between encoding of distractor coherence and performance (top row: Accuracy, bottom row: RT). Across A and B, parcels are thresholded at p < .001 (uncorrected, in jointly reliable parcels), and outlined parcels are significant at p < .05 I (max-statistic randomization test across jointly reliable parcels). C) Individual differences in feature-RT alignment correlated with feature-accuracy alignment across regions (correlation values in top right; p < .05 in red). See Supplementary Table 1 for partial correlations controlling for reliability. GLM: Performance, see Table 2.