Skip to main content
. 2024 May 30;21:11. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.11

Table 7.

Survey results on the participating professors’ (test item developers and test examiners) perceptions of the overlap between the clinical skill test's evaluation objectives and dental specialty areas

Evaluation objectives Response (no., %)
P-valuea)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
1. patient interview, history taking, diagnosis, and treatment planning 0.905
 Test item developers (n=16) 0 0 4 (25.0) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 7 (21.9) 8 (25.0) 14 (43.8)
2. Oromaxillofacial cranial nerve examination 0.137
 Test item developers (n=16) 5 (31.3) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8)
 Test examiners (n=32) 3 (9.4) 8 (25.0) 10 (31.2) 9 (28.1) 2 (6.2)
3. Temporomandibular disorder palpation test 0.307
 Test item developers (n=16) 2 (12.5) 4 (25.0) 5 (31.2) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8)
 Test examiners (n=32) 3 (9.4) 4 (12.5) 12 (37.5) 11 (34.4) 2 (6.2)
4. Pulp test 0.534
 Test item developers (n=16) 0 1 (6.2) 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 0 2 (6.2) 11 (34.4) 8 (25.0) 11 (34.4)
5. Periodontal test 0.571
 Test item developers (n=16) 0 1 (6.2) 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 12 (37.5) 7 (21.9) 11 (34.4)
6. Intraoral X-ray taking 0.432
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 8 (25.0) 10 (31.2) 11 (34.4)
7. Local anesthesia 0.478
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 7 (21.9) 12 (37.5) 11 (34.4)
8. Rubber dam application 0.413
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 6 (18.8) 11 (34.4) 12 (37.5)
9. Topical fluoride application 0.494
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 4 (25.0) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 0 8 (25.0) 13 (40.6) 10 (31.2)
10. Pit and fissure sealant 0.785
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 4 (25.0) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 7 (21.9) 12 (37.5) 11 (34.4)
11. Scaling 0.673
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 6 (18.8) 10 (31.2) 13 (40.6)
12. Root planning 0.413
 Test item developers (n=16) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 8 (50.0) 0
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 3 (9.4) 7 (21.9) 10 (31.2) 11 (34.4)
13. Simple extraction 0.575
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 3 (9.4) 7 (21.9) 10 (31.2) 11 (34.4)
14. Suturing skills 0.819
 Test item developers (n=16) 0 0 4 (25.0) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 0 9 (28.1) 9 (28.1) 13 (40.6)
15. Space management for primary and mixed dentition 0.682
 Test item developers (n=16) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8) 7 (43.8) 3 (18.8) 1 (6.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 3 (9.4) 3 (9.4) 12 (37.5) 12 (37.5) 2 (6.2)
16. Oral hygiene education 0.813
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 2 (12.5) 5 (31.2) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 8 (25.0) 9 (28.1) 13 (40.6)
17. Endodontic treatment 0.423
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 1 (6.2) 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 3 (9.4) 8 (25.0) 12 (37.5) 8 (25.0)
18. Amalgam restoration in posterior teeth 0.645
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 5 (31.2) 2 (12.5) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 10 (31.2) 8 (25.0) 11 (34.4)
19. Resin composite restoration in anterior teeth 0.668
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 4 (25.0) 8 (50.0)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 2 (6.2) 10 (31.2) 8 (25.0) 11 (34.4)
20. Gold inlay cavity preparation in posterior teeth 0.444
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 10 (31.2) 10 (31.2) 10 (31.2)
21. Gold crown preparation in posterior teeth and fabrication of a temporary crown 0.417
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 11 (34.4) 9 (28.1) 10 (31.2)
22. Porcelain fused to metal crown in anterior teeth and fabrication of a temporary crown 0.294
 Test item developers (n=16) 1 (6.2) 0 3 (18.8) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2)
 Test examiners (n=32) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 11 (34.4) 10 (31.2) 9 (28.1)
a)

The chi-squared test was conducted to compare the differences between the groups in response results (α=0.05).