Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 1;14:15061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65994-2

Table 2.

Results of proportional hazards regression models for GLIM criteria malnutrition and adverse clinical outcomes (HRs with 95% CI).

Outcome Moderate malnourished(n = 49)a Severe malnourished(n = 17)a
n = 135 Crude Adjustedb Crude Adjustedb
Adverse clinical outcome 2.79 (1.44–5.39) 2.86 (1.45–5.67) 4.10 (1.89–8.87) 3.88 (1.51–9.94)
 Clinical death 0.94 (0.16–5.61) 0.56 (0.85–3.77) 6.01 (1.34–26.90) 3.15 (0.39–25.42)
 Hemodynamic instability 3.08 (1.24–7.63) 2.62 (1.02–6.70) 5.35 (1.94–14.78) 3.67 (1.13–11.96)
 Cardiovascular events 2.87 (0.26–31.66) 3.50 (0.29–41.72) 4.53 (0.28–72.39) 10.51 (0.29–378.43)
 Gastrointestinal events 1.51 (0.38–6.06) 1.89 (0.44–8.08) 1.06 (0.12–9.50) 2.20 (0.17–28.89)
 Blood transfusion 2.46 (0.59–10.31) 5.58 (0.87–35.73)
 Multidrug resistant infection 2.43 (0.58–10.18) 3.29 (0.72–14.99) 1.69 (0.18–16.32) 1.74 (0.12–24.50)

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, CCI Charlson Comorbidity Index.

aReference to well-nutrition participants. HRs was calculated by using proportional hazards regression models.

bAdjusted for age, sex, primary diagnosis, SOFA score, and CCI score.