Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 1;14:15061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65994-2

Table 3.

Change of nutritional status in first 7 days.

Mean (95% CI) Well-nourished Malnourished Group * timea
n = 35 n = 26 β (95% CI) Ward X2 P
RFMT (mm)
 Day 1 15.46 (9.74 to 11.98) 10.56 (9.23 to 11.88) 1.85 (0.45 to 3.24) 6.701 0.010
 Day 7 13.92 (12.75 to 15.09) 10.86 (9.74 to 11.98)
 Difference  − 1.54 (− 2.35 to − 0.74) 0.30 (− 0.84 to 1.45)
CC (cm)
 Day 1 34.46 (33.23 to 35.69) 31.02 (29.61 to 32.42) 0.99 (− 0.16 to 2.15) 2.839 0.092
 Day 7 33.56 (32.53 to 34.58) 31.11 (29.82 to 32.39)
 Difference  − 0.90 (− 1.59 to − 0.21) 0.09 (− 0.83 to 1.02)
MAMC
 Day 1 25.23 (24.13 to 26.33) 22.34 (21.35 to 22.33) 2.09 (0.03 to 4.16) 3.935 0.047
 Day 7 23.61 (21.82 to 25.40) 22.81 (21.57 to 24.05)
 Difference  − 1.62 (− 3.49 to 0.25) 0.47 (− 0.41 to 1.35)
PVFT (mm)
 Day 1 13.27 (11.69 to 14.85) 9.71 (7.65 to 11.77)  − 1.50 (− 2.91 to − 0.09) 4.386 0.037
 Day 7 15.02 (12.98 to 17.06) 9.96 (8.21 to 11.70)
 Difference 1.75 (0.52 to 2.98) 0.24 (− 0.45 to 0.94)
SFT (mm)
 Day 1 12.80 (10.80 to 14.81) 10.88 (8.74 to 13.02) 1.09 (− 0.84 to 3.01) 1.220 0.269
 Day 7 11.71 (10.07 to 13.38) 10.89 (8.67 to 13.11)
 Mean difference  − 1.08 (− 2.68 to 0.52) 0.01 (− 1.19 to 1.21)

RFMT Rectus femoris muscle thickness, CC Calf circumference, MAMC Mid-arm muscle circumference, PVFT Preperitoneal visceral fat thickness, SFT subcutaneous fat thickness.

aInteractive effects of group and time, reference to well-nourished participants. Regression coefficients is calculated by using generalized estimating equations.