Skip to main content
. 2024 May 22;32(7):858–863. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01617-8

Table 1.

Result of variant classification: average grading and percentage of variant reporting.

Case # Gene Varianta Clinical fit with variant ACMGb grade ABC-Ac grade ABC-Bc grade % reported after ACMG Incl maybe % reported after ACMG excl maybe % reported after ABC
1 CHEK2 p.(Ile200Thr) Good 3,5 - VUS 4,3 - LFE 2,3 - RF 83 71 91
2 CACNA1A p.(Arg1437Gln) Good 3,2 - VUS 3,1 - HFE 1,9 - RF 95 81 95
3 ADAMTS18

p.(Arg246Ter)

p.(Arg573Pro)

Excellent

4,3 - LP

3,3 - VUS

4,4 - LFE

3,1 - HFE

3,1 - P

2,0 - RF

95 95 100
4 HUWE1 p.(Glu4315Lys) Good 3,3 - VUS 3,4 - HFE 1,9- RF 95 74 100
5 COL5A1 Thr915Met Good 2,9 - VUS 2,6 - HFE 1,5 - VOI 80 54 79
6 Deletion of ANK2 1 Mb de novo deletion ? Normal fetus 3,8 - LP 3,6 - LFE 0,8 - VOI 67 57 65
7 Duplication of 16p11.2 227 kb duplication Moderate 3,1 - VUS 3,0 - HFE 1,5 - VOI 71 60 79
8 PTPN11 p.(Gly268Ser) Poor 4,2 - LP 3,9 - LFE 1,2 - VOI 64 50 67
9 TNFRSF1A p.(Arg121Gln) Moderate 2,6 - VUS 3,1 - HFE 2,0 - RF 64 40 81
10 ABCA4 p.(Asn1868Ile) Excellent 2,7 - VUS 3,6 - LFE 1,8 - RF 67 50 86

LP likely pathogenic, VUS variant of unknown significance, LFE likely functional effect, HFE hypothetical functional effect, RF risk factor, VOI variant of interest, P pathogenic.

aFor variant details, see Supplementary File S1.

bThe ACMG grades are the average of the grades given by all participating laboratories, see Supplementary File S2 for details. Please note that to be able to calculate this, ACMG classes were converted to numbers: P = 5, LP = 4, VUS = 3, LB = 2 and B = 1.

cABC grades are the average of ABC-A and ABC-B grading, see Supplementary File S2 for details.