Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 4;13:683. Originally published 2024 Jun 24. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.150779.2

Table 4. Qualitative IQ analysis between Manual and Automatic positioning group.

Qualitative IQ R1 R2 k-value p-value (MP vs AP)
Scores 1 2 3 4 5 Mean (SD) 1 2 3 4 5 Mean (SD) R1 R2
MP group
IN 0 0 0 128 15 4.10 (0.31) 0 0 0 127 16 4.11 (0.32) 0.98 <0.05 <0.05
IA 0 0 0 03 140 4.98 (0.15) 0 0 0 03 140 4.98 (0.15) 1.00 0.652 0.652
IS 0 0 0 20 123 4.86 (0.34) 0 0 0 20 123 4.86 (0.35) 0.97 <0.05 <0.05
OIQ 0 0 0 132 11 4.08 (0.26) 0 0 0 131 12 4.08 (0.28) 0.97 <0.05 <0.05
AP group
IN 0 0 0 03 140 4.98 (0.15) 0 0 0 02 141 4.99 (0.12) 0.88 - -
IA 0 0 0 02 141 4.99 (0.12) 0 0 0 02 141 4.99 (0.12) 1.00
IS 0 0 0 04 139 4.97 (0.17) 0 0 0 01 142 4.98 (0.15) 0.92
OIQ 0 0 0 05 138 4.97 (0.19) 0 0 0 04 139 4.97 (0.17) 0.94

IQ image quality, IN image noise, IA image artifacts, IS image sharpness, OIQ overall image quality, MP manual positioning, AP automatic positioning, R1 Reader1, R2 reader 2, SD standard deviation.