Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 1;1(2):76–82. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0484

Table 2.

Results of the pre- and post-training assessment per participants socio-professional characteristics, level of healthcare facility and CXR reading experience.

Participant characteristics CXR readings Correctly interpreted CXR (pre-training) Correctly interpreted CXR (post-training) P-value*
n n (%) n (%)
Profession
 Medical doctor 780 544 (69.7) 647 (82.9) <0.001
 Nurse 1,140 696 (61.1) 899 (78.9) <0.001
 Radiology technician 340 260 (76.5) 289 (85.0) 0.005
 Other 180 106 (58.9) 135 (75.0) 0.001
Place of work
 District hospital 1,160 825 (71.1) 968 (83.4) <0.001
 Primary health centre 1,360 823 (60.5) 1,059 (77.9) <0.001
CXR interpreted in the month before training
 Yes 460 356 (77.4) 397 (86.3) <0.001
 No 2,060 1,295 (62.9) 1,619 (78.6) <0.001
Previous experience interpreting CXR
 Yes 880 627 (71.3) 741 (84.2) <0.001
 No 1,640 1,018 (62.1) 1,283 (78.2) <0.001
*

Mc Nemar's test.

Missing information: profession (n = 400 CXR readings); place of work (n = 320 CXR readings).

CXR = chest X-ray.