Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 30;20(3):112–123. doi: 10.12965/jer.2448214.107

Table 3.

Importance, objectives, frequency, timing, location, and limitations of the use of recovery strategies in water polo coaches (n=76)

Level First division club Second division club Third division club Territorial division club National senior team National team of different categories except senior Team of different categories except senior All
Do you believe that recovery strategies are important in your context?
 Not important at all 0 (0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (6.3) 1 (1.0)
 Of little importance 0 (0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Of average importance 0 (0) 1 (12.5) - 1 (3.6) 0 (0) 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 3 (3.9)
 Very important 11 (55.0) 4 (50.0) - 19 (67.9) 1 (100) 2 (66.7) 8 (50.0) 45 (59.2)
 Extremely important 9 (45.0) 3 (37.5) - 8 (28.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (43.8) 27 (35.5)

If you believe that recovery strategies are important, why are they important?
 To reduce the injury risk 16 (28.1) 5 (20.8) - 23 (28.0) 1 (33.3) 2 (22.2) 15 (31.3) 62 (26.9)
 To decrease the cumulative fatigue 13 (22.8) 6 (25.0) - 16 (19.5) 0 (0) 1 (11.1) 4 (8.3) 40 (17.3)
 To decrease the chance of overtraining 9 (15.8) 2 (8.3) - 7 (8.5) 1 (33.3) 2 (22.2) 15 (31.5) 36 (15.6)
 To improve the performance capability in the following training sesión or competition 13 (22.8) 7 (29.2) - 20 (24.4) 1 (33.3) 3 (33.3) 13 (27.1) 57 (24.7)
 To improve psychological wellbeing 5 (8.8) 2 (8.3) - 14 (17.1) 0 (0) 1 (11.1) 8 (16.7) 30 (13)
 To induce placebo effect on the players 1 (1.8) 1 (4.2) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0.9)
 Because of players like recovery strategies 0 (0) 0 (0) - 1 (1.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.4)
 To improve social recovery 0 (0) 1 (4.2) - 1 (1.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.1) 3 (1.3)
 Other 0 (0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

How often do you use recovery strategies in your team?
 Never 1 (5.0) 0 (0) - 3 (10.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (6.3) 5 (6.6)
 Rarely, in less than 10% of the sessions 1 (5.0) 1 (12.5) - 8 (28.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (18.8) 13 (17.1)
 Occasionally, in about 30% of the sessions 3 (15.0) 3 (37.5) - 10 (35.7) 0 (0) 2 (66.7) 5 (31.3) 23 (30.3)
 Sometimes, in about 50% of the sessions 6 (30.0) 1 (12.5) - 3 (10.7) 1 (100) 0 (0) 3 (18.8) 14 (18.4)
 Frequently, in about 70% of the sessions 4 (20.0) 3 (37.5) - 4 (14.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (12.5) 13 (17.1)
 Usually, in about 90% of the sessions 3 (15.0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (6.3) 4 (5.3)
 Every time 2 (10.0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (33.3) 1 (6.3) 4 (5.3)

When do you apply recovery strategies?
 Pregame 9 (17.6) 0 (0) - 4 (7.4) 1 (20.0) 0 (0) 4 (11.1) 18 (10.8)
 Pretraining session 6 (11.8) 0 (0) - 6 (11.1) 1 (20.0) 0 (0) 4 (11.1) 17 (10.2)
 Postgame 12 (23.5) 3 (21.4) - 16 (29.6) 1 (20.0) 3 (42.9) 8 (22.2) 43 (25.9)
 Posttraining session 11 (21.6) 5 (35.7) - 16 (29.6) 1 (20.0) 1 (14.3) 10 (27.8) 44 (26.5)
 In separate sessions 7 (13.7) 4 (28.6) - 4 (7.4) 0 (0) 2 (28.6) 6 (16.7) 23 (13.9)
 When travelling 5 (9.8) 2 (14.3) - 6 (11.1) 1 (20.0) 1 (14.3) 2 (5.6) 17 (10.2)
 Never 0 (0) 0 (0) - 2 (3.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.8) 3 (1.8)
 Other 1 (2.0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.6)

Where do you usually apply recovery strategies?
 In the sports hall or in the gym 18 (72.0) 7 (53.8) - 21 (48.8) 1 (50.0) 3 (42.9) 14 (65.2) 64 (57.1)
 At home 5 (20.0) 3 (23.1) - 13 (30.2) 1 (50.0) 0 (0) 3 (13.0) 25 (21.3)
 At hotel 1 (4.0) 2 (15.4) - 8 (18.6) 0 (0) 3 (42.9) 4 (17.4) 18 (16.8)
 On the road (on the bus, on the plane, etc.) 0 (0) 1 (7.7) - 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 1 (14.3) 1 (4.3) 4 (3.6)
 Other 1 (4.0) 0 (0) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.9)

What prevents you from using the recovery strategies that you would like to adopt?
 They are too expensive 7 (20.0) 3 (23.1) - 15 (27.3) 1 (50.0) 0 (0) 5 (17.2) 31 (22.5)
 They are too time-consuming 11 (32.4) 4 (30.8) - 14 (25.5) 0 (0) 2 (40.0) 9 (31.0) 40 (29.0)
 They are not well accepted by players or coaches 4 (11.8) 1 (7.7) - 6 (10.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (17.2) 16 (11.6)
 There are no available devices or facilities to implement those strategies 11 (32.4) 2 (15.4) - 18 (32.7) 1 (50.0) 3 (60.0) 7 (24.1) 42 (30.4)
 Their effects are not sufficiently studied in the scientific literature 1 (2.9) 2 (15.4) - 2 (3.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (6.9) 7 (5.1)
 Other 0 (0) 1 (7.7) - 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (3.4) 2 (1.4)

Values are presented as number (%).