Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 8;44(8):1469–1479. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05629-x

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical and functional AT assessments

PsA + AT
(n = 11)
PsA-AT
(n = 11)
Healthy controls (n = 11) p value
Self-reported
Presence of AT morning stiffness 10 (90.9%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%) < 0.001
VISA-A (0-100) 35.8 [25.7] 70.8 [18.9] 92.3 [7.3] < 0.000
Current AT pain VAS (0–10) 4.8 [5.7] 0 [0] 0 [0] < 0.001
AT pain VAS in last 7 days (0–10) 3.6 [6.3] 0 [0] 0 [0] < 0.001
Clinical assessment
Clinical AT enthesitis (LEI) 6 (45.5%) 0 0 0.001
Pain on palpation 11 (100%) 1 (9.1%) 0 < 0.001
Tendon loading
Pain on passive dorsiflexion 4 (36.4%) 0 0 0.011
Pain on resisted plantarflexion 5 (45.5%) 0 0 0.003
Performance-based measures
Heel raise rep rate 0.72 [0.67] 1.24 [0.83] 1.29 [0.42] 0.005
10 MWT time (seconds) 13.87 [5.63] 12.48 [4.98] 11.62 [2.12] 0.086

PsA + AT = PsA with AT pain group, PsA-AT = PsA without AT pain group. Data presented as median [interquartile range]. p values based on Pearson’s chi squared statistical test, bold indicates p < 0.05 for significance.