Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 17;9(26):29053–29068. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04483

Table 3. Results of ANOVA Analysis for Quadratic Model Regression of the TPC in the Aqueous Extract of Olive Tree Leavesa.

interaction type source TPC [μg GAE/mL]
    coefficient factor SS df MS F-value p-value
  model 143.300 5750,334 9 638,926 119.874 <0.0001*
linear x1 12.901 1331.538 1 1331.538 2493.984 <0.0001*
  x2 18.705 2799.016 1 2799.016 5242.585 <0.0001*
  x3 8.721 608.482 1 608.482 1139.692 <0.0001*
quadratic x21 –4.195 74.097 1 74.097 138.784 0.0003*
  x22 –12.088 615.190 1 615.190 1152.257 <0.0001*
  x23 –7.340 226.845 1 226.845 424.882 <0.0001*
interaction x1x2 –0.453 0.819 1 0.819 1.534 0.283
  x1x3 –1.250 6.250 1 6.250 11.706 0.027*
  x2x3 –0.808 2.608 1 2.608 4.885 0.092
residual     37.31 7 5.330    
pure error     2.136 4 0.534    
LoF     35.171 3 11.724 21.959 0.006*
core total     5787.644 16      
a

Note: SD = 19.02; mean = 132.18; R2 = 0.9936; Radj2 = 0.9853; Rpred2 = 0.9948; coefficient of variation (CV) % = 14.3; adequate precision = 36.5057; PRESS = 30.2435; SS—sum of squares; MS—mean square; PRESS—predicted residual error sum of squares; df–degree of freedom; * significant for p < 0.05.