Table 2.

Cortical thickness differences in frontal areas between IPV perpetrators and controls classified according to their executive performance.

Region	IPV perpetrators dysexecutive (n = 38)	IPV perpetrators non-dysexecutive (n = 22)	Controls (n = 57)	F ANOVA	Significance	Effect size	Group differences
Rostral anterior cingulate (left)	2.65 (0.170)	2.67 (0.213)	2.69 (0.173)	0.744	0.478	0.013
Rostral anterior cingulate (right)	2.65 (0.197)	2.69 (0.177)	2.76 (0.165)	3.74	0.027	0.062	Ac
Rostral middle frontal (left)	2.32 (0.131)	2.36 (0.105)	2.38 (0.097)	3.01	0.053	0.050
Rostral middle frontal (right)	2.35 (0.126)	2.38 (0.110)	2.40 (0.103)	2.36	0.099	0.040
Superior frontal (left)	2.66 (0.138)	2.69 (0.126)	2.73 (0.112)	3.67	0.028	0.061	ac
Superior frontal (right)	2.67 (0.136)	2.69 (0.119)	2.73 (0.116)	3.15	0.047	0.052	ac
Caudal anterior cingulate (left)	2.44 (0.217)	2.38 (0.175)	2.43 (0.181)	0.813	0.446	0.014
Caudal anterior cingulate (right)	2.36 (0.165)	2.34 (0.184)	2.38 (0.154)	0.563	0.571	0.010
Caudal middle frontal (left)	2.49 (0.134)	2.53 (0.103)	2.55 (0.137)	3.48	0.034	0.058	ac
Caudal middle frontal (right)	2.49 (0.128)	2.51 (0.137)	2.56 (0.109)	3.32	0.040	0.055	ac
Lateral orbitofrontal (left)	2.65 (0.121)	2.65 (0.128)	2.69 (0.141)	1.57	0.213	0.027
Lateral orbitofrontal (right)	2.56 (0.154)	2.56 (0.133)	2.59 (0.161)	0.733	0.483	0.013
Medial orbitofrontal (left)	2.39 (0.116)	2.38 (0.126)	2.44 (0.138)	2.34	0.101	0.039
Medial orbitofrontal (right)	2.47 (0.127)	2.46 (0.138)	2.53 (0.114)	4.19	0.018	0.068	ac
Paracentral (left)	2.40 (0.153)	2.39 (0.151)	2.45 (0.144)	1.71	0.185	0.029
Paracentral (right)	2.37 (0.144)	2.38 (0.148)	2.45 (0.144)	3.64	0.029	0.060	ac
Precentral (left)	2.49 (0.148)	2.51 (0.189)	2.59 (0.146)	5.79	0.004	0.092	ac
Precentral (right)	2.48 (0.139)	2.49 (0.173)	2.56 (0.157)	3.24	0.043	0.054	–

Note.Group differences: a (IPV perpetrators dysexecutive); b (IPV perpetrators non-dysexecutive); c (controls). The bold values are significant P values.