Skip to main content
. 2024 May 13;33(2):143–154. doi: 10.7570/jomes23072

Table 2.

Liver fibrosis trend indices of the patients categorized according to muscle-quality tertiles and assessed using muscle echo-intensity

Variable Muscle quality Post hoc test SS* P for trend*
Modest (M) Intermediate (I) Poor (P) M vs. I M vs. P I vs. P
All patients (n = 307)
Number 103 101 103
Men 66 (64.1) 45 (44.6) 32 (31.1)
Liver stiffness 6.44 ± 3.15 8.90 ± 6.21 12.06 ± 11.99 0.085 < 0.001 < 0.050 4.68 < 0.001
Liver steatosis 293.51 ± 50.86 295.90 ± 42.93 278.28 ± 54.28 > 0.999 0.085 < 0.050 −2.22 < 0.050
NFS −2.25 ± 1.40 −1.37 ± 1.58 −0.61 ± 1.68 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.010 6.96 < 0.001
FIB-4 index 1.13 ± 0.70 1.65 ± 1.20 2.41 ± 1.88 < 0.050 < 0.001 < 0.001 7.04 < 0.001
M2BPGi* 0.79 ± 0.51 0.90 ± 1.13 1.37 ± 1.21 1.000 < 0.010 < 0.010 3.68 < 0.001
Non-obese patients (n = 98)
Number 33 33 32
Men 18 (54.5) 17 (51.5) 10 (31.2)
Liver stiffness 5.09 ± 1.63 6.33 ± 4.93 11.88 ± 11.09 > 0.999 < 0.010 < 0.010 3.77 < 0.001
Liver steatosis 261.70 ± 47.31 269.12 ± 38.47 252.59 ± 45.37 > 0.999 > 0.999 0.397 −0.85 0.395
NFS −2.62 ± 1.66 −1.23 ± 1.47 −0.52 ± 1.63 < 0.010 < 0.001 0.235 4.76 < 0.001
FIB-4 index 1.21 ± 0.80 1.89 ± 1.37 3.08 ± 2.32 0.267 < 0.001 < 0.050 5.18 < 0.001
M2BPGi* 0.75 ± 0.61 0.74 ± 0.53 1.48 ± 0.77 > 0.999 < 0.010 < 0.010 3.60 < 0.001

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation. The ranges of muscle echo-intensity for each tertile were as follows: all patients: modest, 40.8–93.0 A.U., intermediate, 93.1–102.2 A.U., poor, 102.2–182.4 A.U.; and non-obese patients: modest, 43.3–92.4 A.U., intermediate, 93.0– 105.6 A.U., poor, 105.9–182.4 A.U.

*The Jonckheere–Terpstra test was used to identify trends in the values across the three groups (two-tailed, P<0.05).

M, modest muscle quality; I, intermediate muscle quality; P, poor muscle quality; SS, standardized statistic; NFS, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score; FIB-4, fibrosis-4; M2BPGi, mac-2–binding protein glycosylation isomer.