Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: Harv Data Sci Rev. 2024 Jan 31;6(1):10.1162/99608f92.9d86a749. doi: 10.1162/99608f92.9d86a749

Table 2.

Comparisons of median C-indices of six machine learning algorithms across varying censoring rates (40% to 80%) under a nonlinear log hazard model using complete data. The table displays median C-index values from 100 experiments, along with their interquartile ranges.

Censoring Rate
40% 60% 70% 80%
Cox Model with Linear Log Hazards 65.6 (2.0) 67.8 (3.0) 69.0 (2.9) 72.5 (3.1)
Survival Support Vector Machines 73.0 (1.7) 74.6 (1.4) 76.3 (1.8) 78.7 (2.4)
Survival Gradient Boosting 72.6 (1.3) 74.2 (1.6) 75.7 (2.1) 78.0 (2.3)
Random Survival Forests 71.5 (1.5) 73.3 (1.6) 75.2 (2.0) 77.5 (1.9)
Naive Ensemble Averaging 71.5 (1.5) 73.4 (1.6) 75.3 (2.0) 77.6 (1.9)
Weighted Ensemble Averaging 73.1 (1.1) 74.8 (1.4) 76.6 (1.6) 78.9 (1.6)